PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EMDV vs. CRBN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV and CRBN is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

EMDV vs. CRBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.89%
6.23%
EMDV
CRBN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EMDV:

0.14

CRBN:

1.63

Sortino Ratio

EMDV:

0.32

CRBN:

2.23

Omega Ratio

EMDV:

1.04

CRBN:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

EMDV:

0.09

CRBN:

2.36

Martin Ratio

EMDV:

0.27

CRBN:

9.45

Ulcer Index

EMDV:

9.00%

CRBN:

2.09%

Daily Std Dev

EMDV:

16.57%

CRBN:

12.16%

Max Drawdown

EMDV:

-39.19%

CRBN:

-33.13%

Current Drawdown

EMDV:

-23.30%

CRBN:

-1.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than CRBN's 3.89% return.


EMDV

YTD

1.91%

1M

3.20%

6M

1.90%

1Y

-0.15%

5Y*

-2.63%

10Y*

N/A

CRBN

YTD

3.89%

1M

0.74%

6M

6.23%

1Y

17.47%

5Y*

10.89%

10Y*

9.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMDV vs. CRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CRBN's 0.20% expense ratio.


EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
Expense ratio chart for EMDV: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for CRBN: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMDV vs. CRBN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMDV is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMDV is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMDV is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMDV is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMDV is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMDV is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CRBN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRBN is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRBN is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRBN is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRBN is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRBN is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRBN is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EMDV vs. CRBN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMDV, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.101.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMDV, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.262.23
The chart of Omega ratio for EMDV, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.041.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMDV, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.062.36
The chart of Martin ratio for EMDV, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.199.45
EMDV
CRBN

The current EMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the CRBN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV and CRBN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.10
1.63
EMDV
CRBN

Dividends

EMDV vs. CRBN - Dividend Comparison

EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than CRBN's 1.87% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
2.74%2.79%1.88%3.68%2.12%3.12%2.38%1.27%2.09%2.79%0.00%
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
1.87%1.94%2.01%1.95%1.57%1.41%2.26%2.51%2.05%2.27%2.01%

Drawdowns

EMDV vs. CRBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.19%, which is greater than CRBN's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and CRBN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-23.30%
-1.46%
EMDV
CRBN

Volatility

EMDV vs. CRBN - Volatility Comparison

ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) have volatilities of 2.91% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.91%
3.01%
EMDV
CRBN
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab