EMDV vs. BDVG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG).
EMDV and BDVG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016. BDVG is an actively managed fund by iMGP. It was launched on Jun 29, 2023.
Performance
EMDV vs. BDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMDV vs. BDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | -1.92% | 11.90% | 0.06% | -4.02% |
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | 2.25% | 13.81% | 11.75% | 3.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly lower than BDVG's 2.25% return.
EMDV
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.42%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
BDVG
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 13.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMDV vs. BDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVG's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMDV vs. BDVG — Risk / Return Rank
EMDV
BDVG
EMDV vs. BDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDV | BDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.31 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 5.84 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDV | BDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.95 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDV and BDVG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMDV vs. BDVG - Dividend Comparison
EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than BDVG's 1.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | 1.67% | 1.75% | 1.69% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMDV vs. BDVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, which is greater than BDVG's maximum drawdown of -14.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and BDVG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDV | BDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.20% | -14.46% | -24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | -11.75% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.40% | -4.92% | -12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -2.41% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.48% | -0.24% |
Volatility
EMDV vs. BDVG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) at 3.48%. This indicates that EMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMDV | BDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 3.48% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 7.27% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 14.70% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 11.99% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 11.99% | +6.29% |