EMA vs. URBN
EMA (Emera Inc) and URBN (Urban Outfitters, Inc.) are both stocks. EMA operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while URBN operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, EMA returned 20.76% vs 2.66% for URBN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMA vs. URBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than URBN's -4.49% return.
EMA
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 20.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URBN
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -5.26%
- 1Y
- 2.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
EMA vs. URBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 5.65% | 11.17% |
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | -4.49% | -0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA and URBN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
EMA:
$15.54B
URBN:
$6.38B
EMA:
$3.55
URBN:
$5.18
EMA:
14.37
URBN:
13.87
EMA:
0.46
URBN:
0.59
EMA:
1.79
URBN:
1.04
EMA:
1.69
URBN:
2.45
EMA:
$8.59B
URBN:
$6.32B
EMA:
$2.83B
URBN:
$2.27B
EMA:
$2.56B
URBN:
$603.32M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA vs. URBN — Risk / Return Rank
EMA
URBN
EMA vs. URBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMA | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 0.10 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 0.19 | +9.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 0.06 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.20 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
EMA vs. URBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum URBN drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and URBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -83.96% | +78.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -26.32% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -13.08% | +8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -32.57% | +30.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 13.72% | -11.52% |
Volatility
EMA vs. URBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emera Inc (EMA) is 4.67%, while Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that EMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMA | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 10.02% | -5.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 28.03% | -17.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 43.10% | -29.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 47.22% | -33.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 48.76% | -35.04% |
Dividends
EMA vs. URBN - Dividend Comparison
EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while URBN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.87% | 2.12% |
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EMA vs. URBN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and Urban Outfitters, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMA vs. URBN - Profitability Comparison
EMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 756.95M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
URBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.57M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.
EMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 626.62M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.
URBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.68M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
EMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 583.50M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.
URBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a net income of 115.71M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMA and URBN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URBN has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to EMA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMA dropped -5.93% vs URBN's -83.96%.
EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMA and URBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer