EMA vs. CNP
Compare and contrast key facts about Emera Inc (EMA) and CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP).
Performance
EMA vs. CNP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMA vs. CNP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 6.49% | 12.99% |
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 13.19% | 4.29% |
Fundamentals
EMA:
$15.65B
CNP:
$28.31B
EMA:
$3.62
CNP:
$1.61
EMA:
14.31
CNP:
26.89
EMA:
1.31
CNP:
2.54
EMA:
$8.79B
CNP:
$0.00
EMA:
$3.43B
CNP:
-$4.00M
EMA:
$3.07B
CNP:
$1.87B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than CNP's 13.19% return.
EMA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 21.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA vs. CNP — Risk / Return Rank
EMA
CNP
EMA vs. CNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA | CNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | 0.18 | +1.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA and CNP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMA vs. CNP - Dividend Comparison
EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than CNP's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.06% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 2.06% | 2.30% | 2.55% | 2.70% | 2.33% | 2.33% | 3.42% | 4.22% | 3.93% | 3.77% | 4.18% | 5.39% |
Drawdowns
EMA vs. CNP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum CNP drawdown of -89.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and CNP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA | CNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -89.94% | +84.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.22% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -32.44% | +30.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility
EMA vs. CNP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMA | CNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 16.16% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 19.62% | -5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 25.83% | -12.17% |
Financials
EMA vs. CNP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and CenterPoint Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMA vs. CNP - Profitability Comparison
EMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 334.73M and revenue of 2.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
CNP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of -2.73B and revenue of -6.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.
EMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 212.83M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
CNP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 542.00M and revenue of -6.85B, resulting in an operating margin of -7.9%.
EMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 86.93M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
CNP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 264.00M and revenue of -6.85B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.