PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMA vs. BIPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EMA vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emera Inc (EMA) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than BIPC's -7.13% return.


EMA

1D
-0.86%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
5.09%
6M
7.85%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIPC

1D
0.17%
1M
12.65%
YTD
-7.13%
6M
-10.06%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMA vs. BIPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EMA
Emera Inc
5.09%12.99%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
-7.13%19.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EMA and BIPC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EMA:

$15.46B

BIPC:

$5.50B

EPS

EMA:

$3.55

BIPC:

-$6.15

PS Ratio

EMA:

1.78

BIPC:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

EMA:

$8.59B

BIPC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EMA:

$2.83B

BIPC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

EMA:

$2.56B

BIPC:

$2.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMA vs. BIPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMA
EMA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPC
BIPC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BIPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMA vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMABIPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.21

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

0.45

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.06

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

0.20

+2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

0.56

+7.06

EMA vs. BIPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the BIPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMA and BIPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMABIPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.21

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.35

+1.00

Drawdowns

EMA vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum BIPC drawdown of -29.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and BIPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMABIPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-29.77%

+23.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-29.77%

+23.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-17.32%

+12.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-7.78%

+6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

10.38%

-8.18%

Volatility

EMA vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Emera Inc (EMA) is 4.25%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that EMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMABIPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

6.92%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

22.44%

-12.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

27.93%

-14.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

29.72%

-16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

29.72%

-16.05%

Dividends

EMA vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison

EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than BIPC's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
4.28%3.79%
EMA
Emera Inc
3.89%2.12%

Financials

EMA vs. BIPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.48B
871.76M
(EMA) Total Revenue
(BIPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EMA vs. BIPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Emera Inc and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
30.5%
61.0%
Portfolio components
EMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 756.95M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

BIPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported a gross profit of 531.53M and revenue of 871.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.0%.

EMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 626.62M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

BIPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported an operating income of 510.82M and revenue of 871.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.6%.

EMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 583.50M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.

BIPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported a net income of -110.45M and revenue of 871.76M, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMA and BIPC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIPC has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to EMA (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMA dropped -5.93% vs BIPC's -29.77%.

EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMA and BIPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer