EMA vs. BB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Emera Inc (EMA) and BlackBerry Limited (BB.TO).
Performance
EMA vs. BB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMA vs. BB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 6.49% | 12.99% |
BB.TO BlackBerry Limited | -14.05% | -7.60% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMA is traded in USD, while BB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
EMA:
$15.65B
BB.TO:
CA$2.69B
EMA:
$3.62
BB.TO:
CA$0.05
EMA:
14.31
BB.TO:
98.85
EMA:
1.77
BB.TO:
4.55
EMA:
1.31
BB.TO:
2.60
EMA:
$8.79B
BB.TO:
CA$593.02M
EMA:
$3.43B
BB.TO:
CA$442.77M
EMA:
$3.07B
BB.TO:
CA$64.69M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than BB.TO's -14.05% return.
EMA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BB.TO
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- -14.05%
- 6M
- -33.50%
- 1Y
- -13.91%
- 3Y*
- -10.90%
- 5Y*
- -17.69%
- 10Y*
- -8.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA vs. BB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EMA
BB.TO
EMA vs. BB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and BlackBerry Limited (BB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA | BB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | -0.24 | +2.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA and BB.TO is -0.19. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EMA vs. BB.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while BB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.06% | 2.12% |
BB.TO BlackBerry Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMA vs. BB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum BB.TO drawdown of -97.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and BB.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA | BB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -98.07% | +92.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -96.99% | +93.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -69.30% | +67.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.96% | — |
Volatility
EMA vs. BB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMA | BB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 45.61% | -31.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 58.64% | -44.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 58.26% | -44.60% |
Financials
EMA vs. BB.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and BlackBerry Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMA vs. BB.TO - Profitability Comparison
EMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 334.73M and revenue of 2.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
BB.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BlackBerry Limited reported a gross profit of 149.97M and revenue of 197.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.
EMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 212.83M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
BB.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BlackBerry Limited reported an operating income of 25.95M and revenue of 197.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
EMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 86.93M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
BB.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BlackBerry Limited reported a net income of 19.11M and revenue of 197.82M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.