EMA vs. FTS
Compare and contrast key facts about Emera Inc (EMA) and Fortis Inc (FTS).
Performance
EMA vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMA vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 6.49% | 12.99% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 8.31% | 10.41% |
Fundamentals
EMA:
$15.65B
FTS:
$33.97B
EMA:
$3.62
FTS:
$3.12
EMA:
14.31
FTS:
17.90
EMA:
0.45
FTS:
2.61
EMA:
1.77
FTS:
2.65
EMA:
1.31
FTS:
1.53
EMA:
$8.79B
FTS:
$11.34B
EMA:
$3.43B
FTS:
$6.40B
EMA:
$3.07B
FTS:
$5.35B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than FTS's 8.31% return.
EMA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTS
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
EMA
FTS
EMA vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | 0.62 | +1.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA and FTS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMA vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than FTS's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.06% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.25% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
EMA vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum FTS drawdown of -34.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and FTS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -34.36% | +28.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -4.73% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -6.90% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.57% | — |
Volatility
EMA vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMA | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 14.66% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 16.16% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 18.96% | -5.30% |
Financials
EMA vs. FTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMA vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison
EMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 334.73M and revenue of 2.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 3.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.8%.
EMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 212.83M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 868.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
EMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 86.93M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 444.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.