ELF vs. ROAD
Compare and contrast key facts about e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD).
Performance
ELF vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ELF vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | -20.29% | -39.43% | -13.02% | 161.01% | 66.52% | 31.84% | 56.17% | 86.26% | -56.22% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 2.37% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | 1.03% | 72.55% | 91.05% | -27.02% |
Fundamentals
ELF:
$3.65B
ROAD:
$6.23B
ELF:
$1.76
ROAD:
$2.19
ELF:
34.37
ROAD:
50.85
ELF:
0.28
ROAD:
0.94
ELF:
2.35
ROAD:
2.03
ELF:
3.14
ROAD:
6.43
ELF:
$1.52B
ROAD:
$3.06B
ELF:
$1.07B
ROAD:
$484.02M
ELF:
$220.91M
ROAD:
$381.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELF achieves a -20.29% return, which is significantly lower than ROAD's 2.37% return.
ELF
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -34.16%
- YTD
- -20.29%
- 6M
- -54.25%
- 1Y
- -3.47%
- 3Y*
- -9.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- —
ROAD
- 1D
- 4.87%
- 1M
- -17.30%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- -12.50%
- 1Y
- 54.61%
- 3Y*
- 60.37%
- 5Y*
- 30.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELF vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank
ELF
ROAD
ELF vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELF | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | 1.19 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.89 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.10 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 4.55 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELF | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 1.19 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.68 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.67 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between ELF and ROAD is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ELF vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison
Neither ELF nor ROAD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ELF vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELF drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF and ROAD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELF | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.09% | -54.54% | -22.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.54% | -26.55% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.09% | -54.54% | -22.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.20% | -19.99% | -52.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.58% | -16.31% | -15.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.06% | 12.27% | +17.79% |
Volatility
ELF vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a higher volatility of 18.98% compared to Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) at 17.72%. This indicates that ELF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ELF | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.98% | 17.72% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.83% | 31.01% | +28.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.99% | 46.05% | +27.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.55% | 44.24% | +12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.20% | 48.43% | +6.77% |
Financials
ELF vs. ROAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Construction Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELF vs. ROAD - Profitability Comparison
ELF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 347.50M and revenue of 489.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.0%.
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.50M and revenue of 809.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.0%.
ELF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.54M and revenue of 489.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.41M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
ELF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 39.38M and revenue of 489.51M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 17.21M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.