PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELF vs. PEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ELF vs. PEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Penumbra, Inc. (PEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly higher than PEN's 3.31% return.


ELF

1D
0.77%
1M
8.47%
6M
-2.47%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
-28.80%
3Y*
-10.73%
5Y*
24.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.40%

PEN

1D
0.43%
1M
0.82%
6M
-10.32%
YTD
3.31%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
16.73%
ALL TIME*
21.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$178.41M$180.75M$221.10M
$134.82M$123.94M$132.27M

ELF vs. PEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
9.01%-39.43%-13.02%161.01%66.52%31.84%56.17%86.26%-61.18%-22.91%
PEN
Penumbra, Inc.
3.31%30.92%-5.59%13.07%-22.57%64.18%6.53%34.43%29.86%47.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ELF and PEN is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.21

The correlation between ELF and PEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ELF:

$4.89B

PEN:

$12.63B

EPS

ELF:

$0.44

PEN:

$4.07

PE Ratio

ELF:

188.69

PEN:

78.91

PEG Ratio

ELF:

4.21

PEN:

0.12

PS Ratio

ELF:

3.03

PEN:

8.42

PB Ratio

ELF:

4.39

PEN:

8.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

ELF:

$1.64B

PEN:

$1.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ELF:

$1.16B

PEN:

$1.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

ELF:

$185.47M

PEN:

$210.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELF vs. PEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ELF
ELF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ELF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PEN
PEN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ELF vs. PEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Penumbra, Inc. (PEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ELFPENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.26

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

1.28

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

3.26

-3.99

ELF vs. PEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the PEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF and PEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ELF vs. PEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, which is greater than PEN's maximum drawdown of -62.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF and PEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFPENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.26%

-62.64%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.20%

-21.44%

-44.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.26%

-45.46%

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.26%

-60.14%

-17.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.98%

-10.63%

-51.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-17.49%

-15.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.58%

8.43%

+35.15%

Volatility

ELF vs. PEN - Volatility Comparison

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a higher volatility of 15.57% compared to Penumbra, Inc. (PEN) at 1.76%. This indicates that ELF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFPENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.57%

1.76%

+13.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

7.28%

+38.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.93%

30.76%

+37.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.93%

40.87%

+17.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.30%

41.27%

+14.03%

Dividends

ELF vs. PEN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELF nor PEN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ELF vs. PEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Penumbra, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ELF vs. PEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Penumbra, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ELF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.

PEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penumbra, Inc. reported a gross profit of 264.94M and revenue of 390.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

ELF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

PEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penumbra, Inc. reported an operating income of 41.04M and revenue of 390.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

ELF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.

PEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penumbra, Inc. reported a net income of 34.81M and revenue of 390.05M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ELF and PEN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELF has higher volatility (15.57%) compared to PEN (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELF dropped -77.26% vs PEN's -62.64%.

PEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELF and PEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer