ELF vs. COTY
ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.) and COTY (Coty Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 5 years, ELF returned 18.00%/yr vs -26.77%/yr for COTY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELF vs. COTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELF achieves a -16.91% return, which is significantly higher than COTY's -37.99% return.
ELF
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 19.43%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -20.17%
- 1Y
- -47.28%
- 3Y*
- -16.48%
- 5Y*
- 18.00%
- 10Y*
- —
COTY
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -37.99%
- 6M
- -39.17%
- 1Y
- -59.96%
- 3Y*
- -46.13%
- 5Y*
- -26.77%
- 10Y*
- -21.70%
ELF vs. COTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | -16.91% | -39.43% | -13.02% | 161.01% | 66.52% | 31.84% | 56.17% | 86.26% | -61.18% | -22.91% |
COTY Coty Inc. | -37.99% | -55.75% | -43.96% | 45.09% | -18.48% | 49.57% | -36.92% | 79.18% | -65.68% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELF and COTY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.42 |
The correlation between ELF and COTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ELF:
$3.79B
COTY:
$1.68B
ELF:
$0.44
COTY:
-$0.61
ELF:
2.29
COTY:
0.29
ELF:
3.35
COTY:
0.57
ELF:
$1.64B
COTY:
$5.79B
ELF:
$1.16B
COTY:
$3.59B
ELF:
$185.47M
COTY:
$4.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELF vs. COTY — Risk / Return Rank
ELF
COTY
ELF vs. COTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Coty Inc. (COTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELF | COTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.75 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.94 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -1.50 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELF vs. COTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELF drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, smaller than the maximum COTY drawdown of -93.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF and COTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELF | COTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.26% | -93.43% | +16.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.20% | -64.08% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.26% | -86.05% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.26% | -86.05% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.02% | -93.21% | +22.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -51.47% | +18.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.67% | 40.01% | +0.66% |
Volatility
ELF vs. COTY - Volatility Comparison
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Coty Inc. (COTY) have volatilities of 17.68% and 16.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELF | COTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.68% | 16.87% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.51% | 35.96% | +7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.17% | 50.90% | +16.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.51% | 44.80% | +12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.30% | 54.47% | +0.83% |
Dividends
ELF vs. COTY - Dividend Comparison
Neither ELF nor COTY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTY Coty Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 4.44% | 7.62% | 2.51% | 2.18% | 0.98% |
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ELF vs. COTY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Coty Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELF vs. COTY - Profitability Comparison
ELF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.
COTY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coty Inc. reported a gross profit of 791.90M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
ELF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
COTY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coty Inc. reported an operating income of -372.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of -29.0%.
ELF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.
COTY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coty Inc. reported a net income of -411.40M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of -32.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELF and COTY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELF has higher volatility (17.68%) compared to COTY (16.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELF dropped -77.26% vs COTY's -93.43%.
ELF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELF and COTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer