ELF vs. UNH
ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.) and UNH (UnitedHealth Group Incorporated) are both stocks. ELF operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while UNH operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, ELF returned 13.72%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for UNH. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELF vs. UNH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELF achieves a -31.64% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 15.37% return.
ELF
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -31.64%
- 6M
- -29.95%
- 1Y
- -54.31%
- 3Y*
- -20.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
UNH
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 6M
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- -7.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
ELF vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | -31.64% | -39.43% | -13.02% | 161.01% | 66.52% | 31.84% | 56.17% | 86.26% | -61.18% | -22.91% |
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 15.37% | -33.14% | -2.41% | 0.80% | 6.94% | 45.20% | 21.25% | 20.00% | 14.52% | 39.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELF and UNH is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
ELF:
$3.12B
UNH:
$343.91B
ELF:
$0.44
UNH:
$13.23
ELF:
117.22
UNH:
28.57
ELF:
1.89
UNH:
0.77
ELF:
2.76
UNH:
3.31
ELF:
$1.64B
UNH:
$449.71B
ELF:
$1.16B
UNH:
$84.55B
ELF:
$185.47M
UNH:
$22.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELF vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank
ELF
UNH
ELF vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELF | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | 0.69 | -1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | 1.14 | -2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.17 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 0.99 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 2.18 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELF | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | 0.69 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.01 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.63 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
ELF vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELF drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, roughly equal to the maximum UNH drawdown of -74.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF and UNH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELF | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.09% | -74.37% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.42% | -28.96% | -36.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.09% | -61.39% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.09% | -61.39% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.16% | -37.35% | -38.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -14.76% | -17.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.32% | 13.18% | +25.14% |
Volatility
ELF vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) at 6.91%. This indicates that ELF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELF | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 6.91% | +10.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.19% | 30.89% | +11.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.82% | 39.87% | +25.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.13% | 31.78% | +25.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 30.15% | +25.00% |
Dividends
ELF vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison
ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 2.34% | 2.64% | 1.62% | 1.38% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.59% |
Financials
ELF vs. UNH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELF vs. UNH - Profitability Comparison
ELF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.
UNH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 25.41B and revenue of 111.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.
ELF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
UNH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 8.99B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
ELF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.
UNH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a net income of 6.28B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELF and UNH have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELF has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to UNH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELF dropped -77.09% vs UNH's -74.37%.
UNH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELF and UNH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer