EFXT vs. CRTO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFXT (Enerflex Ltd.) and CRTO (Criteo S.A.) are both stocks. EFXT operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while CRTO operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, EFXT returned 14.46%/yr vs -9.37%/yr for CRTO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EFXT vs. CRTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFXT achieves a 68.34% return, which is significantly higher than CRTO's -16.79% return. Over the past 10 years, EFXT has outperformed CRTO with an annualized return of 14.46%, while CRTO has yielded a comparatively lower -9.37% annualized return.

EFXT

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: 68.34%
• 6M: 89.05%
• 1Y: 248.58%
• 3Y*: 64.38%
• 5Y*: 32.01%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

CRTO

• 1D: -8.34%
• 1M: -10.91%
• YTD: -16.79%
• 6M: -13.21%
• 1Y: -34.44%
• 3Y*: -20.34%
• 5Y*: -16.23%
• 10Y*: -9.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFXT vs. CRTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.	68.34%	57.04%	115.79%	-25.13%	5.83%	15.59%	-42.16%	-17.32%	-2.49%	-1.70%
CRTO Criteo S.A.	-16.79%	-47.90%	56.24%	-2.84%	-32.96%	89.52%	18.35%	-23.72%	-12.72%	-36.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EFXT and CRTO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2013	0.09

The correlation between EFXT and CRTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap EFXT : $3.16B CRTO : $874.07M
EPS EFXT : $0.97 CRTO : $2.15
PE Ratio EFXT : 26.83 CRTO : 7.98
PEG Ratio EFXT : 2.93 CRTO : 0.05
PS Ratio EFXT : 1.01 CRTO : 0.48
PB Ratio EFXT : 2.77 CRTO : 0.77
Total Revenue (TTM) EFXT : $3.13B CRTO : $1.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) EFXT : $689.73M CRTO : $1.04B
EBITDA (TTM) EFXT : $321.86M CRTO : $269.43M

Return for Risk

EFXT vs. CRTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFXT

EFXT Risk / Return Rank: 99
EFXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
EFXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EFXT Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EFXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EFXT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CRTO

CRTO Risk / Return Rank: 10
CRTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CRTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CRTO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CRTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CRTO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFXT vs. CRTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.04	-0.81	+6.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.55	-0.96	+6.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	0.87	+0.91
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	17.03	-0.84	+17.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	56.79	-1.40	+58.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFXT vs. CRTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFXT Sharpe Ratio is 6.04, which is higher than the CRTO Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFXT and CRTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04	-0.81	+6.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	-0.37	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	-0.19	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	-0.11	+0.26

Drawdowns

EFXT vs. CRTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFXT drawdown since its inception was -81.64%, smaller than the maximum CRTO drawdown of -89.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFXT and CRTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.64%	-89.17%	+7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.70%	-41.02%	+26.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.26%	-68.06%	+16.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.16%	-68.06%	+11.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.04%	-88.48%	+9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.63%	-70.88%	+62.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.32%	-45.83%	+7.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	24.54%	-20.14%

Volatility

EFXT vs. CRTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) is 11.75%, while Criteo S.A. (CRTO) has a volatility of 28.34%. This indicates that EFXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.75%	28.34%	-16.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.77%	37.18%	-3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.61%	42.88%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.81%	43.81%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.04%	48.23%	-0.19%

Dividends

EFXT vs. CRTO - Dividend Comparison

EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while CRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRTO Criteo S.A.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.	0.46%	0.72%	0.82%	1.56%	1.22%	1.14%	2.42%	3.43%	2.13%	2.08%	2.67%	3.55%

Financials

EFXT vs. CRTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enerflex Ltd. and Criteo S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EFXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 140.03M and revenue of 575.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.

CRTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 222.74M and revenue of 424.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.5%.

EFXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 65.09M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

CRTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 10.40M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

EFXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of 42.40M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

CRTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 8.58M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFXT and CRTO in my portfolio?

EFXT and CRTO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFXT or CRTO?

CRTO has higher volatility (28.34%) compared to EFXT (11.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFXT dropped -81.64% vs CRTO's -89.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.04 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.