EFXT vs. CRTO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO).

Performance

EFXT vs. CRTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EFXT vs. CRTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.	29.09%	57.04%	115.79%	-25.13%	5.83%	15.59%	-42.16%	-17.32%	-2.49%	-1.70%
CRTO Criteo S.A.	-10.58%	-47.90%	56.24%	-2.84%	-32.96%	89.52%	18.35%	-23.72%	-12.72%	-36.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EFXT : $2.45B CRTO : $978.78M
EPS EFXT : $0.73 CRTO : $2.63
PE Ratio EFXT : 27.37 CRTO : 7.01
PEG Ratio EFXT : 0.96 CRTO : 0.05
PS Ratio EFXT : 0.68 CRTO : 0.52
PB Ratio EFXT : 1.63 CRTO : 0.85
Total Revenue (TTM) EFXT : $3.59B CRTO : $1.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) EFXT : $779.05M CRTO : $1.05B
EBITDA (TTM) EFXT : $432.81M CRTO : $302.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFXT achieves a 29.09% return, which is significantly higher than CRTO's -10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EFXT has outperformed CRTO with an annualized return of 11.82%, while CRTO has yielded a comparatively lower -7.76% annualized return.

EFXT

• 1D: -4.92%
• 1M: -14.70%
• YTD: 29.09%
• 6M: 81.32%
• 1Y: 154.71%
• 3Y*: 51.29%
• 5Y*: 26.78%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

CRTO

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: -10.58%
• 6M: -16.91%
• 1Y: -48.24%
• 3Y*: -16.37%
• 5Y*: -12.60%
• 10Y*: -7.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EFXT vs. CRTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFXT

EFXT Risk / Return Rank: 96
EFXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EFXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EFXT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EFXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EFXT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CRTO

CRTO Risk / Return Rank: 7
CRTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CRTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRTO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFXT vs. CRTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	-1.14	+4.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	-1.77	+5.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	0.80	+0.73
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.46	-0.90	+8.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.71	-1.27	+21.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFXT vs. CRTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFXT Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the CRTO Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFXT and CRTO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38	-1.14	+4.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	-0.30	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	-0.16	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	-0.10	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between EFXT and CRTO is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EFXT vs. CRTO - Dividend Comparison

EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while CRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.	0.58%	0.72%	0.82%	1.56%	1.22%	1.14%	2.42%	3.43%	2.13%	2.08%	2.67%	3.55%
CRTO Criteo S.A.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EFXT vs. CRTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFXT drawdown since its inception was -81.64%, smaller than the maximum CRTO drawdown of -89.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFXT and CRTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.64%	-89.17%	+7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.45%	-53.30%	+31.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.16%	-66.47%	+10.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.04%	-88.48%	+9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.70%	-68.71%	+54.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-45.51%	+6.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.73%	37.85%	-30.12%

Volatility

EFXT vs. CRTO - Volatility Comparison

Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO) have volatilities of 10.12% and 9.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFXT	CRTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.12%	9.66%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.64%	27.70%	+5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.05%	42.27%	+3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.87%	42.81%	+6.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.41%	47.63%	+0.78%

Financials

EFXT vs. CRTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enerflex Ltd. and Criteo S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EFXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 166.21M and revenue of 876.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

CRTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 297.40M and revenue of 541.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

EFXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 85.20M and revenue of 876.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

CRTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 72.51M and revenue of 541.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

EFXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of -78.39M and revenue of 876.40M, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.

CRTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 46.37M and revenue of 541.14M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.