EFXT vs. GHM
EFXT (Enerflex Ltd.) and GHM (Graham Corporation) are both stocks. EFXT operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while GHM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, EFXT returned 14.46%/yr vs 20.45%/yr for GHM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFXT vs. GHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFXT achieves a 68.34% return, which is significantly higher than GHM's 61.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EFXT has underperformed GHM with an annualized return of 14.46%, while GHM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.45% annualized return.
EFXT
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 68.34%
- 6M
- 89.05%
- 1Y
- 248.58%
- 3Y*
- 64.38%
- 5Y*
- 32.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
GHM
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 61.72%
- 6M
- 81.27%
- 1Y
- 153.96%
- 3Y*
- 109.11%
- 5Y*
- 48.61%
- 10Y*
- 20.45%
EFXT vs. GHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 68.34% | 57.04% | 115.79% | -25.13% | 5.83% | 15.59% | -42.16% | -17.32% | -2.49% | -1.70% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 61.72% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFXT and GHM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2011 | 0.12 |
The correlation between EFXT and GHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFXT:
$3.16B
GHM:
$1.16B
EFXT:
$0.97
GHM:
$1.34
EFXT:
26.83
GHM:
77.31
EFXT:
2.93
GHM:
1.51
EFXT:
1.01
GHM:
4.86
EFXT:
2.77
GHM:
8.83
EFXT:
$3.13B
GHM:
$237.56M
EFXT:
$689.73M
GHM:
$58.50M
EFXT:
$321.86M
GHM:
$19.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFXT vs. GHM — Risk / Return Rank
EFXT
GHM
EFXT vs. GHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Graham Corporation (GHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFXT | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.42 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.03 | 8.51 | +8.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.79 | 20.90 | +35.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFXT | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04 | 3.06 | +2.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.00 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.46 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.25 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
EFXT vs. GHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFXT drawdown since its inception was -81.64%, smaller than the maximum GHM drawdown of -86.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFXT and GHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFXT | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.64% | -86.11% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -18.21% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.26% | -46.46% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.16% | -54.28% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.04% | -74.83% | -4.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -2.11% | -6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.32% | -47.41% | +9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 7.40% | -3.00% |
Volatility
EFXT vs. GHM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) is 11.75%, while Graham Corporation (GHM) has a volatility of 12.92%. This indicates that EFXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFXT | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.75% | 12.92% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.77% | 36.59% | -2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.61% | 50.73% | -9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.81% | 48.94% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.04% | 44.98% | +3.06% |
Dividends
EFXT vs. GHM - Dividend Comparison
EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 0.46% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.14% | 2.42% | 3.43% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.67% | 3.55% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
Financials
EFXT vs. GHM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enerflex Ltd. and Graham Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFXT vs. GHM - Profitability Comparison
EFXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 140.03M and revenue of 575.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.47M and revenue of 56.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.
EFXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 65.09M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of -219.00K and revenue of 56.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
EFXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of 42.40M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 2.85M and revenue of 56.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFXT and GHM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to EFXT (11.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFXT dropped -81.64% vs GHM's -86.11%.
EFXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.04 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFXT and GHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer