EFXT vs. PRG
EFXT (Enerflex Ltd.) and PRG (PROG Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. EFXT operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while PRG operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, EFXT returned 12.03%/yr vs 8.74%/yr for PRG. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EFXT vs. PRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFXT achieves a 44.76% return, which is significantly lower than PRG's 50.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EFXT has outperformed PRG with an annualized return of 12.03%, while PRG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.74% annualized return.
EFXT
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- YTD
- 44.76%
- 1Y
- 188.20%
- 3Y*
- 41.75%
- 5Y*
- 32.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.22%
PRG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- YTD
- 50.60%
- 1Y
- 46.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | $14.36M | $11.34M | $12.73M |
| $25.64M | $22.44M | $21.41M |
EFXT vs. PRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 44.76% | 57.04% | 115.79% | -25.13% | 5.83% | 15.59% | -42.16% | -17.32% | -2.49% | -1.70% |
PRG PROG Holdings, Inc. | 50.60% | -28.95% | 38.41% | 83.01% | -62.56% | -16.26% | 11.71% | 36.15% | 5.81% | 24.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFXT and PRG is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2011 | 0.10 |
The correlation between EFXT and PRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFXT:
$2.72B
PRG:
$1.76B
EFXT:
$0.97
PRG:
$3.61
EFXT:
23.03
PRG:
12.20
EFXT:
2.52
PRG:
1.14
EFXT:
0.87
PRG:
0.72
EFXT:
2.38
PRG:
2.23
EFXT:
$3.13B
PRG:
$2.48B
EFXT:
$689.73M
PRG:
$893.15M
EFXT:
$321.86M
PRG:
$981.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFXT vs. PRG — Risk / Return Rank
EFXT
PRG
EFXT vs. PRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFXT | PRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.20 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.16 | 1.31 | +5.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.28 | 2.66 | +20.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFXT vs. PRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFXT drawdown since its inception was -81.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PRG drawdown of -80.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFXT and PRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFXT | PRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.64% | -80.87% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.49% | -31.21% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.35% | -51.86% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.16% | -73.96% | +17.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.04% | -80.87% | +1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.43% | -30.58% | +9.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | -28.44% | -9.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 15.34% | -7.51% |
Volatility
EFXT vs. PRG - Volatility Comparison
Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) at 10.69%. This indicates that EFXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFXT | PRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | 10.69% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.58% | 38.70% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.53% | 45.91% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.24% | 50.93% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.35% | 49.90% | -1.55% |
Dividends
EFXT vs. PRG - Dividend Comparison
EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PRG's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.14% | 2.42% | 3.43% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.67% | 3.55% |
PRG PROG Holdings, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.76% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.32% | 0.42% |
Financials
EFXT vs. PRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enerflex Ltd. and PROG Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFXT vs. PRG - Profitability Comparison
EFXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 140.03M and revenue of 575.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.
PRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.34M and revenue of 564.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
EFXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 65.09M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
PRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 73.93M and revenue of 564.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
EFXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of 42.40M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
PRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 37.03M and revenue of 564.80M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFXT and PRG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFXT has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to PRG (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFXT dropped -81.64% vs PRG's -80.87%.
EFXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFXT and PRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer