PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFXT vs. PPIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFXT vs. PPIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFXT achieves a 68.34% return, which is significantly higher than PPIH's 6.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFXT having a 14.46% annualized return and PPIH not far ahead at 15.15%.


EFXT

1D
-1.26%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
68.34%
6M
89.05%
1Y
248.58%
3Y*
64.38%
5Y*
32.01%
10Y*
14.46%

PPIH

1D
-1.10%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
6.26%
6M
9.84%
1Y
126.70%
3Y*
45.89%
5Y*
35.82%
10Y*
15.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFXT vs. PPIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFXT
Enerflex Ltd.
68.34%57.04%115.79%-25.13%5.83%15.59%-42.16%-17.32%-2.49%-1.70%
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.
6.26%103.08%88.36%-16.01%8.87%42.53%-35.07%7.20%-2.78%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EFXT and PPIH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.08

The correlation between EFXT and PPIH shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFXT:

$3.16B

PPIH:

$264.73M

EPS

EFXT:

$0.97

PPIH:

$2.08

PE Ratio

EFXT:

26.83

PPIH:

15.48

PEG Ratio

EFXT:

2.93

PPIH:

0.42

PS Ratio

EFXT:

1.01

PPIH:

1.25

PB Ratio

EFXT:

2.77

PPIH:

2.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFXT:

$3.13B

PPIH:

$210.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFXT:

$689.73M

PPIH:

$69.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

EFXT:

$321.86M

PPIH:

$32.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFXT vs. PPIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFXT
EFXT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EFXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFXT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EFXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PPIH
PPIH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PPIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPIH Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PPIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPIH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFXT vs. PPIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFXTPPIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.33

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.03

4.05

+12.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.79

9.84

+46.95

EFXT vs. PPIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFXT Sharpe Ratio is 6.04, which is higher than the PPIH Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFXT and PPIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFXTPPIHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04

1.82

+4.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.63

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.36

-0.21

Drawdowns

EFXT vs. PPIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFXT drawdown since its inception was -81.64%, which is greater than PPIH's maximum drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFXT and PPIH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFXTPPIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.64%

-58.53%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-31.45%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.26%

-45.77%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.16%

-58.53%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.04%

-58.53%

-20.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.63%

-8.59%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.32%

-20.56%

-17.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

12.92%

-8.52%

Volatility

EFXT vs. PPIH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) is 11.75%, while Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that EFXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFXTPPIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.75%

13.46%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.77%

36.97%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.61%

70.37%

-28.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.81%

57.30%

-8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.04%

47.06%

+0.98%

Dividends

EFXT vs. PPIH - Dividend Comparison

EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while PPIH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFXT
Enerflex Ltd.
0.46%0.72%0.82%1.56%1.22%1.14%2.42%3.43%2.13%2.08%2.67%3.55%
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EFXT vs. PPIH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enerflex Ltd. and Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
575.91M
55.13M
(EFXT) Total Revenue
(PPIH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EFXT vs. PPIH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enerflex Ltd. and Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
24.3%
31.5%
Portfolio components
EFXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 140.03M and revenue of 575.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.

PPIH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.34M and revenue of 55.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.

EFXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 65.09M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

PPIH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.97M and revenue of 55.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

EFXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of 42.40M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

PPIH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.92M and revenue of 55.13M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFXT and PPIH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPIH has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to EFXT (11.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFXT dropped -81.64% vs PPIH's -58.53%.

EFXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.04 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFXT and PPIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer