CRTO vs. ZUMZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ).

Performance

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRTO Criteo S.A.	-10.58%	-47.90%	56.24%	-2.84%	-32.96%	89.52%	18.35%	-23.72%	-12.72%	-36.64%
ZUMZ Zumiez Inc.	-15.36%	35.89%	-5.75%	-6.44%	-54.70%	30.48%	6.49%	80.18%	-7.95%	-4.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRTO : $978.78M ZUMZ : $380.32M
EPS CRTO : $2.63 ZUMZ : $0.78
PE Ratio CRTO : 7.01 ZUMZ : 28.32
PS Ratio CRTO : 0.52 ZUMZ : 0.41
PB Ratio CRTO : 0.85 ZUMZ : 1.17
Total Revenue (TTM) CRTO : $1.94B ZUMZ : $929.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRTO : $1.05B ZUMZ : $332.54M
EBITDA (TTM) CRTO : $302.17M ZUMZ : $17.04M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTO achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly higher than ZUMZ's -15.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CRTO has underperformed ZUMZ with an annualized return of -7.76%, while ZUMZ has yielded a comparatively higher 0.73% annualized return.

CRTO

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: -10.58%
• 6M: -16.91%
• 1Y: -48.24%
• 3Y*: -16.37%
• 5Y*: -12.60%
• 10Y*: -7.76%

ZUMZ

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -13.93%
• YTD: -15.36%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 50.31%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: -12.71%
• 10Y*: 0.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRTO vs. ZUMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTO

CRTO Risk / Return Rank: 7
CRTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CRTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRTO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ZUMZ

ZUMZ Risk / Return Rank: 69
ZUMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ZUMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ZUMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ZUMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ZUMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTO	ZUMZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.14	0.95	-2.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.77	1.67	-3.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.20	-0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	1.51	-2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	3.32	-4.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTO Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the ZUMZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTO and ZUMZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTO	ZUMZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.14	0.95	-2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	-0.25	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	0.01	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.05	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between CRTO and ZUMZ is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRTO nor ZUMZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTO drawdown since its inception was -89.17%, roughly equal to the maximum ZUMZ drawdown of -88.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTO and ZUMZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTO	ZUMZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.17%	-88.06%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.30%	-31.87%	-21.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.47%	-78.80%	+12.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.48%	-78.80%	-9.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.71%	-59.64%	-9.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.51%	-48.74%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.85%	14.49%	+23.36%

Volatility

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Criteo S.A. (CRTO) is 9.66%, while Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) has a volatility of 16.06%. This indicates that CRTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTO	ZUMZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.66%	16.06%	-6.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.70%	32.11%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.27%	53.44%	-11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.81%	50.82%	-8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.63%	51.00%	-3.37%

Financials

CRTO vs. ZUMZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Criteo S.A. and Zumiez Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 297.40M and revenue of 541.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

ZUMZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported a gross profit of 111.40M and revenue of 291.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

CRTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 72.51M and revenue of 541.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

ZUMZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported an operating income of 24.53M and revenue of 291.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

CRTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 46.37M and revenue of 541.14M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

ZUMZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported a net income of 19.55M and revenue of 291.31M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.