EFSC vs. PNFP
EFSC (Enterprise Financial Services Corp) and PNFP (Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EFSC vs. PNFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EFSC
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 14.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
PNFP
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFSC vs. PNFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp | 9.81% |
PNFP Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFSC and PNFP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.68 |
Fundamentals
EFSC:
$2.19B
PNFP:
$14.12B
EFSC:
$5.39
PNFP:
$6.80
EFSC:
10.95
PNFP:
13.75
EFSC:
1.12
PNFP:
2.19
EFSC:
2.30
PNFP:
2.23
EFSC:
1.12
PNFP:
1.02
EFSC:
$954.93M
PNFP:
$4.01B
EFSC:
$670.18M
PNFP:
$2.75B
EFSC:
$290.91M
PNFP:
$877.12M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFSC vs. PNFP — Risk / Return Rank
EFSC
PNFP
EFSC vs. PNFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFSC | PNFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFSC | PNFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.06 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
EFSC vs. PNFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFSC drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, which is greater than PNFP's maximum drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFSC and PNFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFSC | PNFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.62% | -19.71% | -57.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -8.10% | +4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.01% | -7.41% | -19.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | — | — |
Volatility
EFSC vs. PNFP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFSC | PNFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 29.67% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.87% | 29.67% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 29.67% | +3.34% |
Dividends
EFSC vs. PNFP - Dividend Comparison
EFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than PNFP's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp | 2.14% | 2.26% | 1.88% | 2.24% | 1.84% | 1.59% | 2.06% | 1.29% | 1.25% | 0.97% | 0.95% | 0.93% |
PNFP Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EFSC vs. PNFP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFSC vs. PNFP - Profitability Comparison
EFSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a gross profit of 177.99M and revenue of 244.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.9%.
PNFP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 1.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.
EFSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported an operating income of 62.86M and revenue of 244.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.
PNFP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 189.00M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
EFSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a net income of 49.36M and revenue of 244.18M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
PNFP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 150.00M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFSC and PNFP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFSC and PNFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer