PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFSC vs. FRME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFSC vs. FRME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and First Merchants Corporation (FRME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFSC achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than FRME's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EFSC has outperformed FRME with an annualized return of 9.39%, while FRME has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.


EFSC

1D
-2.91%
1M
1.50%
YTD
9.91%
6M
6.86%
1Y
14.20%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
9.39%

FRME

1D
-3.11%
1M
-2.80%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.67%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFSC vs. FRME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFSC
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
9.91%-2.14%29.29%-6.64%6.02%36.90%-25.74%29.99%-15.86%6.10%
FRME
First Merchants Corporation
4.77%-2.55%11.82%-5.82%1.11%14.99%-6.93%24.62%-16.93%13.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EFSC and FRME is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2003

0.62

The correlation between EFSC and FRME shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFSC:

$2.19B

FRME:

$2.37B

EPS

EFSC:

$5.39

FRME:

$3.40

PE Ratio

EFSC:

10.95

FRME:

11.43

PEG Ratio

EFSC:

1.12

FRME:

13.48

PS Ratio

EFSC:

2.30

FRME:

2.17

PB Ratio

EFSC:

1.12

FRME:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFSC:

$954.93M

FRME:

$1.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFSC:

$670.18M

FRME:

$484.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

EFSC:

$290.91M

FRME:

$217.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFSC vs. FRME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFSC
EFSC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRME
FRME Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FRME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRME Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FRME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRME Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFSC vs. FRME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and First Merchants Corporation (FRME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFSCFRMEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

0.29

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

0.58

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.45

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.92

0.93

+0.99

EFSC vs. FRME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the FRME Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFSC and FRME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFSCFRMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.29

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.01

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.22

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.20

0.00

Drawdowns

EFSC vs. FRME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFSC drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FRME drawdown of -81.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFSC and FRME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFSCFRMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.62%

-81.31%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-15.73%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

-23.94%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.76%

-43.72%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.17%

-53.03%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-10.00%

+5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.01%

-19.24%

-7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

7.57%

-0.15%

Volatility

EFSC vs. FRME - Volatility Comparison

Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and First Merchants Corporation (FRME) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFSCFRMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

6.14%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.29%

16.39%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

24.60%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.87%

30.03%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.01%

32.79%

+0.22%

Dividends

EFSC vs. FRME - Dividend Comparison

EFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than FRME's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFSC
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
2.14%2.26%1.88%2.24%1.84%1.59%2.06%1.29%1.25%0.97%0.95%0.93%
FRME
First Merchants Corporation
3.70%3.82%3.48%3.61%3.04%2.70%2.78%2.40%2.45%1.64%1.43%1.61%

Financials

EFSC vs. FRME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and First Merchants Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
244.18M
248.57M
(EFSC) Total Revenue
(FRME) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EFSC vs. FRME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and First Merchants Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
72.9%
0
Portfolio components
EFSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a gross profit of 177.99M and revenue of 244.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.9%.

FRME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Merchants Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 248.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EFSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported an operating income of 62.86M and revenue of 244.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

FRME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Merchants Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 248.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EFSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a net income of 49.36M and revenue of 244.18M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

FRME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Merchants Corporation reported a net income of 28.16M and revenue of 248.57M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFSC and FRME have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFSC has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to FRME (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFSC dropped -77.62% vs FRME's -81.31%.

EFSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFSC and FRME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer