PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PNFP vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PNFPRF
YTD Return42.89%40.58%
1Y Return72.52%70.57%
3Y Return (Ann)7.21%7.15%
5Y Return (Ann)16.87%14.34%
10Y Return (Ann)13.61%13.80%
Sharpe Ratio2.112.59
Sortino Ratio2.963.62
Omega Ratio1.361.45
Calmar Ratio2.142.24
Martin Ratio8.5514.19
Ulcer Index8.67%5.19%
Daily Std Dev35.15%28.45%
Max Drawdown-77.20%-92.65%
Current Drawdown-2.65%-0.15%

Fundamentals


PNFPRF
Market Cap$9.79B$23.79B
EPS$5.20$1.77
PE Ratio24.2714.79
PEG Ratio0.604.84
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.83B$8.07B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.09B$8.09B
EBITDA (TTM)$172.04M$1.45B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between PNFP and RF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PNFP vs. RF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PNFP achieves a 42.89% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 40.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PNFP having a 13.61% annualized return and RF not far ahead at 13.80%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
48.38%
33.79%
PNFP
RF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PNFP vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNFP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PNFP, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PNFP, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PNFP, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PNFP, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PNFP, currently valued at 8.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.55
RF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RF, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RF, currently valued at 14.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.19

PNFP vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNFP Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the RF Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNFP and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.11
2.59
PNFP
RF

Dividends

PNFP vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

PNFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than RF's 3.69% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PNFP
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
0.71%1.01%1.20%0.75%0.99%1.00%1.26%0.84%0.81%0.93%0.81%0.25%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
3.69%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

PNFP vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNFP drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNFP and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.65%
-0.15%
PNFP
RF

Volatility

PNFP vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 12.29%. This indicates that PNFP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.86%
12.29%
PNFP
RF

Financials

PNFP vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items