PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFSC vs. AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFSC vs. AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and Axos Financial, Inc. (AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFSC achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than AX's 1.85% return.


EFSC

1D
1.81%
1M
3.18%
YTD
13.21%
6M
12.27%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
9.71%

AX

1D
1.62%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.85%
6M
7.54%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
28.52%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFSC vs. AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFSC
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
13.21%-2.14%29.29%-6.64%6.02%36.90%-25.74%29.99%-27.67%
AX
Axos Financial, Inc.
1.85%23.35%27.93%42.86%-31.64%48.97%23.94%20.25%-27.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EFSC and AX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.73

The correlation between EFSC and AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFSC:

$2.26B

AX:

$5.07B

EPS

EFSC:

$5.39

AX:

$8.22

PE Ratio

EFSC:

11.27

AX:

10.68

PEG Ratio

EFSC:

1.15

AX:

0.49

PS Ratio

EFSC:

2.37

AX:

10.61

PB Ratio

EFSC:

1.16

AX:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFSC:

$954.93M

AX:

$479.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFSC:

$670.18M

AX:

$302.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

EFSC:

$290.91M

AX:

$826.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFSC vs. AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFSC
EFSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AX
AX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFSC vs. AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and Axos Financial, Inc. (AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFSCAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.82

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.38

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.35

2.85

-0.50

EFSC vs. AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFSC and AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFSCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.32

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.29

-0.09

Drawdowns

EFSC vs. AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFSC drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, which is greater than AX's maximum drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFSC and AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFSCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.62%

-59.57%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-19.04%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

-34.92%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.76%

-46.31%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-13.13%

+11.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.01%

-20.58%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.41%

9.19%

-1.78%

Volatility

EFSC vs. AX - Volatility Comparison

Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) and Axos Financial, Inc. (AX) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFSCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

5.57%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

24.15%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.41%

32.14%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.84%

40.79%

-11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.00%

44.21%

-11.21%

Dividends

EFSC vs. AX - Dividend Comparison

EFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AX
Axos Financial, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFSC
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
2.07%2.26%1.88%2.24%1.84%1.59%2.06%1.29%1.25%0.97%0.95%0.93%

Financials

EFSC vs. AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Axos Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B-500.00M0.00500.00M20222023202420252026
244.18M
-1.06B
(EFSC) Total Revenue
(AX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EFSC vs. AX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Axos Financial, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
72.9%
62.2%
Portfolio components
EFSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a gross profit of 177.99M and revenue of 244.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.9%.

AX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axos Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of -657.74M and revenue of -1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.

EFSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported an operating income of 62.86M and revenue of 244.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

AX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axos Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of -325.40M and revenue of -1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.8%.

EFSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a net income of 49.36M and revenue of 244.18M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

AX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axos Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 124.68M and revenue of -1.06B, resulting in a net margin of -11.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFSC and AX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFSC has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to AX (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFSC dropped -77.62% vs AX's -59.57%.

AX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFSC and AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer