EFNL vs. FNDA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).
EFNL and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFNL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2012. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both EFNL and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFNL or FNDA.
Key characteristics
| EFNL | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.61% | 14.80% |
| 1Y Return | 4.16% | 28.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.12% | 4.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.13% | 11.98% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.07% | 9.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 1.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.81 | 2.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.26 | 3.09 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.98 | 10.60 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.02% | 3.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.26% | 19.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.70% | -44.64% |
| Current Drawdown | -26.59% | -1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFNL and FNDA is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EFNL vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EFNL achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EFNL has underperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 4.07%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFNL vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFNL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFNL vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFNL vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
EFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than FNDA's 2.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF | 5.91% | 4.31% | 5.94% | 2.29% | 2.94% | 5.70% | 3.83% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 1.57% | 3.54% | 2.47% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 2.67% | 2.49% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 2.30% | 1.92% | 2.48% | 1.59% | 1.53% | 2.36% | 1.81% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
EFNL vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFNL drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFNL and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFNL vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) is 5.21%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that EFNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.