PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFNL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFNL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFNL achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EFNL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


EFNL

1D
0.84%
1M
5.22%
YTD
21.56%
6M
27.81%
1Y
47.25%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
10.12%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFNL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
21.56%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EFNL and VOO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012

0.62

The correlation between EFNL and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFNL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFNL
VOO

Financial Services

26.0%
11.6%

Technology

21.4%
35.7%

Industrials

20.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
10.2%

Basic Materials

6.3%
1.8%

Energy

5.2%
3.5%

Utilities

4.0%
2.4%

Healthcare

3.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
11.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.9%

Financial Services

EFNL
26.0%
VOO
11.6%

Technology

EFNL
21.4%
VOO
35.7%

Industrials

EFNL
20.8%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EFNL
6.6%
VOO
10.2%

Basic Materials

EFNL
6.3%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

EFNL
5.2%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

EFNL
4.0%
VOO
2.4%

Healthcare

EFNL
3.5%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

EFNL
2.9%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

EFNL
2.6%
VOO
11.3%

Real Estate

EFNL
0.7%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFNL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFNL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFNLVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

2.53

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.59

3.43

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.19

3.42

+2.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.92

15.95

+5.98

EFNL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFNL Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFNL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFNLVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.53

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.85

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.87

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.89

-0.42

Drawdowns

EFNL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFNL drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFNL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFNLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-33.99%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-8.90%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

-18.69%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-24.52%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-33.99%

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.93%

-3.69%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.91%

+0.33%

Volatility

EFNL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that EFNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFNLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

2.74%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

8.88%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

11.78%

+5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

16.81%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

18.01%

+2.08%

EFNL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFNL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFNL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

EFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
2.79%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFNL and VOO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFNL dropped -38.70% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 10.12% for EFNL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

EFNL is categorized as Europe Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EFNL and 0.03% for VOO.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFNL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer