EFNL vs. CN1G.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CN1G.DE).
EFNL and CN1G.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFNL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2012. CN1G.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Nordic Countries. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. Both EFNL and CN1G.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFNL or CN1G.DE.
Key characteristics
| EFNL | CN1G.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.61% | 3.13% |
| 1Y Return | 4.16% | 11.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.12% | 1.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.13% | 10.25% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.07% | 8.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.81 | 1.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.26 | 0.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.98 | 2.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.02% | 3.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.26% | 13.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.70% | -32.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -26.59% | -10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFNL and CN1G.DE is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EFNL vs. CN1G.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EFNL achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly lower than CN1G.DE's 3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EFNL has underperformed CN1G.DE with an annualized return of 4.07%, while CN1G.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFNL vs. CN1G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFNL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than CN1G.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFNL vs. CN1G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CN1G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFNL vs. CN1G.DE - Dividend Comparison
EFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, while CN1G.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF | 5.91% | 4.31% | 5.94% | 2.29% | 2.94% | 5.70% | 3.83% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 1.57% | 3.54% | 2.47% |
CN1G.DE Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFNL vs. CN1G.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFNL drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, which is greater than CN1G.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFNL and CN1G.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFNL vs. CN1G.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CN1G.DE) at 4.62%. This indicates that EFNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CN1G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.