PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFNL vs. EDEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFNL vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFNL vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
4.17%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
-7.84%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFNL achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -7.84% return. Over the past 10 years, EFNL has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 8.79%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


EFNL

1D
1.70%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
4.17%
6M
16.25%
1Y
41.22%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
8.79%

EDEN

1D
0.78%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
-7.84%
6M
-4.54%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFNL vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFNL and EDEN have an expense ratio of 0.53%.


Return for Risk

EFNL vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFNL vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFNLEDENDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

0.23

+2.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

0.46

+2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.06

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

0.21

+3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.52

0.50

+16.02

EFNL vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFNL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFNL and EDEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFNLEDENDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.23

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.16

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.63

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between EFNL and EDEN is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EFNL vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

EFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than EDEN's 3.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
3.26%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
3.02%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%

Drawdowns

EFNL vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFNL drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFNL and EDEN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFNLEDENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-36.61%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-21.17%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-36.61%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-36.61%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-17.82%

+14.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-7.28%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

8.78%

-6.30%

Volatility

EFNL vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) is 6.82%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that EFNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFNLEDENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

7.27%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

15.46%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

23.03%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

20.19%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

19.35%

+0.64%