EFAV vs. VEA
EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFAV returned 5.92%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
EFAV vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 5.92%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.
EFAV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
EFAV vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 4.42% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 7.20% | -0.06% | 16.67% | -5.74% | 22.24% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 15.19% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and VEA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EFAV and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFAV vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAV
VEA
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EFAV
VEA
Industrials
EFAV
VEA
Healthcare
EFAV
VEA
Consumer Defensive
EFAV
VEA
Communication Services
EFAV
VEA
Utilities
EFAV
VEA
Energy
EFAV
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
EFAV
VEA
Technology
EFAV
VEA
Real Estate
EFAV
VEA
Basic Materials
EFAV
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
VEA
EFAV vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.37 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.77 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 10.82 | -6.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.06 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -60.68% | +33.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -11.63% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -13.45% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | -29.71% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | -35.73% | +8.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -0.66% | -4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -13.29% | +8.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.98% | -0.66% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) is 3.14%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 5.49% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 13.32% | -5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 15.64% | -5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 16.54% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 17.35% | -4.14% |
EFAV vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAV vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than VEA's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.06% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.61% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAV and VEA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to EFAV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.13% vs 5.92% for EFAV. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.61% for VEA.
EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAV and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer