EFAV vs. QDIV
EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) and QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAV returned 6.57%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for QDIV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
EFAV vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than QDIV's 12.29% return.
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.11%
QDIV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.77%
EFAV vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 7.06% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 7.20% | -0.06% | 16.67% | -6.18% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 12.29% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and QDIV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EFAV and QDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAV vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAV
QDIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EFAV
QDIV
Industrials
EFAV
QDIV
Consumer Defensive
EFAV
QDIV
Healthcare
EFAV
QDIV
Communication Services
EFAV
QDIV
Utilities
EFAV
QDIV
-
Energy
EFAV
QDIV
Consumer Cyclical
EFAV
QDIV
Technology
EFAV
QDIV
Real Estate
EFAV
QDIV
-
Basic Materials
EFAV
QDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
QDIV
EFAV vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.91 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 4.75 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and QDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -41.20% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -7.97% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -16.81% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | -18.52% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -0.65% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -5.49% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.21% | -0.35% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) is 2.68%, while Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 4.56% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 8.67% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.65% | 12.29% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 15.27% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 19.36% | -6.34% |
EFAV vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EFAV and QDIV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAV vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than QDIV's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.15% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAV and QDIV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDIV has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to EFAV (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs QDIV's -41.20%.
On 5-year performance, QDIV leads with 7.69% vs 6.57% for EFAV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDIV has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAV and QDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.90% for QDIV.
EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QDIV is Dividend. EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.
QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAV and QDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer