PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. QDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than QDIV's 8.38% return.


EFAV

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
3.77%
6M
6.13%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
6.10%

QDIV

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.92%
YTD
8.38%
6M
8.73%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.77%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-6.55%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
8.38%3.16%10.62%5.18%-0.50%28.99%0.03%29.00%-12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and QDIV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.57

The correlation between EFAV and QDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAV vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAV
QDIV

Financial Services

19.9%
6.9%

Industrials

15.1%
16.5%

Healthcare

12.4%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
21.9%

Communication Services

9.7%
3.7%

Utilities

9.1%

-

Energy

8.2%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
6.1%

Technology

4.5%
8.1%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
8.4%

Financial Services

EFAV
19.9%
QDIV
6.9%

Industrials

EFAV
15.1%
QDIV
16.5%

Healthcare

EFAV
12.4%
QDIV
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

EFAV
11.5%
QDIV
21.9%

Communication Services

EFAV
9.7%
QDIV
3.7%

Utilities

EFAV
9.1%
QDIV

-

Energy

EFAV
8.2%
QDIV
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAV
5.2%
QDIV
6.1%

Technology

EFAV
4.5%
QDIV
8.1%

Real Estate

EFAV
2.9%
QDIV

-

Basic Materials

EFAV
1.6%
QDIV
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAVQDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.76

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

4.52

-0.74

EFAV vs. QDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the QDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and QDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAVQDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.19

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.42

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and QDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVQDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-41.20%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-7.97%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-16.81%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-18.52%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-3.81%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-5.54%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.10%

-0.72%

Volatility

EFAV vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) at 2.46%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVQDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.46%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

7.99%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

11.81%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

15.30%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

19.41%

-6.19%

EFAV vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFAV and QDIV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAV vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than QDIV's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
2.99%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and QDIV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAV has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to QDIV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs QDIV's -41.20%.

On 5-year performance, QDIV leads with 6.36% vs 6.01% for EFAV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDIV has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV and QDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.99% for QDIV.

EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QDIV is Dividend. EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and QDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer