EFAV vs. MVAL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL).
EFAV and MVAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. MVAL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 26, 2024. Both EFAV and MVAL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EFAV vs. MVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFAV vs. MVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 5.94% | 26.00% | 3.01% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | -1.89% | 14.17% | 6.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than MVAL's -1.89% return.
EFAV
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.46%
MVAL
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAV vs. MVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVAL's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. MVAL — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
MVAL
EFAV vs. MVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAV | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 0.78 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 1.23 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.14 | +1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 4.09 | +6.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAV | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.78 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and MVAL is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EFAV vs. MVAL - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than MVAL's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.02% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 1.78% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. MVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than MVAL's maximum drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and MVAL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -19.56% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -13.29% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -10.20% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -3.31% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.71% | -1.77% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. MVAL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) at 4.52%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | MVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.52% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 9.72% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 18.82% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 15.58% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 15.58% | -2.37% |