PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVAL vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVAL vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.37% return.


MVAL

1D
1.42%
1M
1.45%
YTD
0.54%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOAT

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-1.37%
6M
-2.45%
1Y
11.95%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVAL vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
0.54%14.17%6.27%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-1.37%13.20%5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and MOAT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024

0.91

The correlation between MVAL and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVAL vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL
MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVALMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

0.97

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

2.89

+0.11

MVAL vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVALMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-33.31%

+13.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-12.43%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-5.14%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-3.83%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

4.14%

+1.15%

Volatility

MVAL vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) is 4.22%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that MVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVALMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.73%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

10.28%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

14.00%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

18.24%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

18.65%

-3.24%

MVAL vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVAL vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
1.74%1.75%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVAL and MOAT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to MVAL (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 1-year performance, MVAL leads with 15.88% vs 11.95% for MOAT. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVAL has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MVAL.

MVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.

MVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. MVAL tracks Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.47% for MOAT.

MVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVAL and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer