MVAL vs. DURA
MVAL (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF) and DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DURA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVAL returned 16.12% vs 22.22% for DURA. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DURA.
Performance
MVAL vs. DURA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 15.95% return.
MVAL
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
DURA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.16K | $85.30K | $69.37K | |
| $7.15K | $13.83K | $24.28K |
MVAL vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 4.99% | 14.17% | 6.27% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 15.95% | 7.61% | 4.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVAL and DURA is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MVAL and DURA shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVAL vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank
MVAL
DURA
MVAL vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVAL | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.55 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 10.15 | -7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVAL vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum DURA drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and DURA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVAL | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -33.15% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -8.53% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -1.69% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -3.88% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 2.14% | +3.45% |
Volatility
MVAL vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) at 3.81%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DURA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVAL | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.81% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.43% | 8.15% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 14.83% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 13.67% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 16.89% | -1.47% |
MVAL vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVAL vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison
MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than DURA's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.13% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 1.66% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVAL and DURA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVAL has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to DURA (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs DURA's -33.15%.
On 1-year performance, DURA leads with 22.22% vs 16.12% for MVAL. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DURA has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DURA has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 16.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MVAL.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.66% for MVAL.
MVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DURA is Large Cap Blend Equities. MVAL tracks Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.29% for DURA.
DURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVAL and DURA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer