PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVAL vs. DURA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MVAL vs. DURA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MVAL vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
-1.89%14.17%6.10%
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
10.74%7.61%4.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 10.74% return.


MVAL

1D
1.69%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
5.21%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DURA

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
10.74%
6M
12.42%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVAL vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MVAL vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL
MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DURA
DURA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVALDURADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.76

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.09

4.18

-0.09

MVAL vs. DURA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the DURA Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and DURA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVALDURADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.76

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and DURA is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MVAL vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than DURA's 3.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
1.78%1.75%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
3.25%3.59%3.33%3.58%3.01%2.89%3.49%3.83%0.66%

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum DURA drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and DURA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MVALDURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-33.15%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-12.36%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-2.62%

-7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-3.96%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.60%

+0.11%

Volatility

MVAL vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) at 2.76%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DURA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MVALDURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.76%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

12.56%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

18.17%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

13.55%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

17.09%

-1.51%