EET vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EET is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. EET is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, EET returned 58.93% vs 127.90% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

EET vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 28.06% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 9.49% return.

EET

• 1D: -4.46%
• 1M: -13.87%
• 6M: 14.18%
• YTD: 28.06%
• 1Y: 58.93%
• 3Y*: 26.92%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 7.58%

WNTR

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 17.94%
• 6M: 21.62%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 1Y: 127.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	28.06%	47.94%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	9.49%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and WNTR is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.38

Return for Risk

EET vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET

EET Risk / Return Rank: 48
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 47
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 53

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 73
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EET	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.39	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.56	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.02	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	7.72	-0.58

EET vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EET vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EET	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.66%	-42.65%	-29.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-42.65%	+16.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.58%	-10.67%	-8.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-20.46%	-16.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.28%	16.63%	-8.35%

Volatility

EET vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 20.56% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 17.89%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EET	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.56%	17.89%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.58%	47.05%	-3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.31%	53.81%	-6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.51%	53.49%	-13.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.08%	53.49%	-12.41%

EET vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EET vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than WNTR's 106.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	1.56%	1.82%	3.85%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	1.40%	0.16%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	106.86%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EET and WNTR in my portfolio?

EET and WNTR have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EET or WNTR?

EET has higher volatility (20.56%) compared to WNTR (17.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, EET or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 127.90% vs 58.93% for EET. On fees, EET is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 17.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EET or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 127.90% return vs 58.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EET or WNTR?

EET is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EET or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 106.86%, compared with 1.56% for EET.

What is the main difference between EET and WNTR?

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.