PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNTR vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNTR vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a -7.49% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -54.27% return.


WNTR

1D
4.50%
1M
25.47%
YTD
-7.49%
6M
10.48%
1Y
73.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTU

1D
-14.03%
1M
-55.66%
YTD
-54.27%
6M
-71.83%
1Y
-95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNTR vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WNTR and MSTU is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

-0.98

The correlation between WNTR and MSTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNTR vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNTR vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WNTRMSTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.78

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

-0.99

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

-1.27

+5.89

WNTR vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNTR and MSTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WNTRMSTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

-0.69

+2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

-0.40

+1.08

Drawdowns

WNTR vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and MSTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNTRMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.65%

-98.58%

+55.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

-96.58%

+53.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.53%

-98.52%

+73.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-71.94%

+50.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.02%

75.17%

-59.15%

Volatility

WNTR vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) is 13.12%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 39.06%. This indicates that WNTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNTRMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.12%

39.06%

-25.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.34%

111.87%

-67.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.83%

138.62%

-87.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.42%

169.06%

-116.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.42%

169.06%

-116.64%

WNTR vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WNTR vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 116.75%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


WNTR and MSTU have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTU has higher volatility (39.06%) compared to WNTR (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WNTR dropped -42.65% vs MSTU's -98.58%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 73.88% vs -95.37% for MSTU. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 13.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 73.88% return vs -95.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 116.75%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

WNTR is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 1.05% for MSTU.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNTR and MSTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer