EET vs. NVDG
EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EET is passively managed, while NVDG is actively managed. Over the past year, EET returned 118.88% vs 83.14% for NVDG. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.
Performance
EET vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's 18.93% return.
EET
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 54.14%
- 6M
- 60.18%
- 1Y
- 118.88%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
NVDG
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 83.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EET vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 54.14% | 63.14% | -7.00% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 18.93% | 32.45% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and NVDG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EET and NVDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EET vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank
EET
NVDG
EET vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EET | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.22 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 1.96 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.64 | 4.44 | +12.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EET | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 1.24 | +1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.40 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
EET vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and NVDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -66.19% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -42.72% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -18.34% | +15.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.27% | -23.07% | -14.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.17% | 18.77% | -11.60% |
Volatility
EET vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 17.46%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EET | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.46% | 25.14% | -7.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.52% | 50.15% | -15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.66% | 67.81% | -28.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 90.72% | -52.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.60% | 90.72% | -50.12% |
EET vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EET vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than NVDG's 9.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.23% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 9.93% | 11.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EET and NVDG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to EET (17.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs NVDG's -66.19%.
On 1-year performance, EET leads with 118.88% vs 83.14% for NVDG. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 17.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EET has performed better with a 118.88% return vs 83.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.
NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 1.23% for EET.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.75% for NVDG.
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EET and NVDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer