NVDG vs. HOOG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDG returned 65.95% vs -5.85% for HOOG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

NVDG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDG achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -37.65% return.

NVDG

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -8.07%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 6M: 13.71%
• 1Y: 65.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: 92.50%
• YTD: -37.65%
• 6M: -47.26%
• 1Y: -5.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF	10.86%	96.47%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-37.65%	320.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDG and HOOG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.52

The correlation between NVDG and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDG

NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 29
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDG	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	-0.04	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	0.98	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.12	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	-0.07	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	-0.11	+3.50

NVDG vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDG and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDG drawdown since its inception was -66.19%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDG and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDG	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.19%	-86.94%	+20.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.72%	-86.94%	+44.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.88%	-70.92%	+47.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.03%	-38.94%	+15.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.49%	55.79%	-36.30%

Volatility

NVDG vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) is 25.02%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 46.00%. This indicates that NVDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDG	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.02%	46.00%	-20.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.21%	101.86%	-49.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.81%	139.56%	-69.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.44%	144.89%	-54.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.44%	144.89%	-54.45%

NVDG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDG and HOOG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

NVDG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, less than HOOG's 19.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	19.73%	12.30%
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF	10.66%	11.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDG and HOOG in my portfolio?

NVDG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDG or HOOG?

HOOG has higher volatility (46.00%) compared to NVDG (25.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDG dropped -66.19% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

Which ETF is better, NVDG or HOOG?

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 65.95% vs -5.85% for HOOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 25.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDG or HOOG?

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 65.95% return vs -5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDG or HOOG?

NVDG and HOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDG or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 19.73%, compared with 10.66% for NVDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.