PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EET vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EET vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than AMDG's -21.97% return.


EET

1D
7.49%
1M
-18.78%
YTD
4.32%
6M
10.24%
1Y
59.33%
3Y*
21.28%
5Y*
-2.38%
10Y*
6.49%

AMDG

1D
7.34%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-21.97%
6M
16.89%
1Y
133.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EET vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EET vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EETAMDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.04

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.13

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.32

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.31

4.53

+3.77

EET vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and AMDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EETAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.04

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.35

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between EET and AMDG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EET vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than AMDG's 14.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.81%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
14.36%11.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EET vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and AMDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EETAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-63.04%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-56.48%

+30.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.01%

-52.31%

+28.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-27.66%

-9.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

28.88%

-21.80%

Volatility

EET vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 21.60%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 33.06%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EETAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

33.06%

-11.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.38%

98.59%

-68.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.28%

129.74%

-89.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

124.94%

-88.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.27%

124.94%

-84.67%