AMDG vs. AMDL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL).

AMDG and AMDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jan 24, 2025. AMDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.

Performance

AMDG vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDG vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	-21.97%	96.98%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	-21.48%	99.36%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMDG having a -21.97% return and AMDL slightly higher at -21.48%.

AMDG

• 1D: 7.34%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: -21.97%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 133.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 7.48%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -21.48%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 137.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDG vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

AMDL

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

AMDG

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

AMDG vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 70
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 72
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDG vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDG	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.07	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.17	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.41	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	4.72	-0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDG vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDG and AMDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDG	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.07	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	-0.27	+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between AMDG and AMDL is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AMDG vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.36%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	14.36%	11.21%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMDG vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDG	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.04%	-88.63%	+25.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.48%	-56.13%	-0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.31%	-52.14%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.66%	-51.71%	+24.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.88%	28.66%	+0.22%

Volatility

AMDG vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) have volatilities of 33.06% and 32.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDG	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.06%	32.68%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	98.59%	97.70%	+0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.74%	129.18%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	124.94%	111.42%	+13.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	124.94%	111.42%	+13.52%