EEMO vs. VAMO
EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. EEMO is passively managed, while VAMO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMO returned 8.50%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for VAMO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EEMO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.
Performance
EEMO vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 36.85% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has outperformed VAMO with an annualized return of 8.50%, while VAMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.68% annualized return.
EEMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 36.85%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- 51.13%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
EEMO vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 36.85% | 10.99% | 9.88% | 13.90% | -18.73% | -5.57% | 9.66% | 21.17% | -17.24% | 49.65% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 3.96% | 16.51% | 6.11% | 5.58% | 8.55% | 32.16% | -4.92% | -4.63% | -11.43% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMO and VAMO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015 | 0.33 |
EEMO vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMO
VAMO
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMO
VAMO
Financial Services
EEMO
VAMO
Basic Materials
EEMO
VAMO
Industrials
EEMO
VAMO
Consumer Cyclical
EEMO
VAMO
Healthcare
EEMO
VAMO
Energy
EEMO
VAMO
Utilities
EEMO
VAMO
Communication Services
EEMO
VAMO
Consumer Defensive
EEMO
VAMO
Real Estate
EEMO
VAMO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMO vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank
EEMO
VAMO
EEMO vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMO | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.57 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 10.28 | +3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMO | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.77 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.48 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.31 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.25 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EEMO vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than VAMO's maximum drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and VAMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMO | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -41.84% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -5.55% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.06% | -11.61% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.03% | -17.25% | -16.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.57% | -41.84% | -4.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -2.00% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.17% | -9.97% | -10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 1.92% | +1.76% |
Volatility
EEMO vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.83%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMO | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 2.83% | +11.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.26% | 7.69% | +14.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.58% | 11.21% | +13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 17.34% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 18.09% | +3.50% |
EEMO vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMO vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison
EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than VAMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.68% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 1.51% | 1.53% | 2.13% | 13.10% | 5.13% | 1.55% | 2.92% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMO and VAMO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMO has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to VAMO (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs VAMO's -41.84%.
On 10-year performance, EEMO leads with 8.50% vs 5.68% for VAMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.
EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.65% for VAMO.
EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMO and VAMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer