EDZ vs. EET
EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) and EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EDZ tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%) while EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDZ returned -36.90%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for EET. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. EDZ charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EET.
Performance
EDZ vs. EET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -55.99% return, which is significantly lower than EET's 41.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EDZ has underperformed EET with an annualized return of -36.90%, while EET has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.
EDZ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -13.80%
- YTD
- -55.99%
- 6M
- -56.70%
- 1Y
- -70.82%
- 3Y*
- -48.07%
- 5Y*
- -24.79%
- 10Y*
- -36.90%
EET
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 41.10%
- 6M
- 42.83%
- 1Y
- 81.79%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
EDZ vs. EET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -55.99% | -59.30% | -12.71% | -20.28% | 49.27% | -8.69% | -68.79% | -43.01% | 32.87% | -64.12% |
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 41.10% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDZ and EET is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009 | -0.98 |
The correlation between EDZ and EET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDZ vs. EET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDZ
EET
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EDZ
EET
Industrials
EDZ
EET
-
Technology
EDZ
EET
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDZ
EET
-
Utilities
EDZ
EET
-
Consumer Defensive
EDZ
EET
-
Healthcare
EDZ
EET
-
Energy
EDZ
EET
-
Basic Materials
EDZ
EET
-
Communication Services
EDZ
EET
-
Real Estate
EDZ
EET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDZ vs. EET — Risk / Return Rank
EDZ
EET
EDZ vs. EET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDZ | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.33 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 3.12 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | 10.84 | -12.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDZ vs. EET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than EET's maximum drawdown of -71.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and EET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDZ | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -71.66% | -28.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.99% | -26.38% | -48.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.46% | -34.89% | -55.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.91% | -64.51% | -28.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.17% | -69.07% | -30.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -11.38% | -88.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -37.16% | -60.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.30% | 7.57% | +34.73% |
Volatility
EDZ vs. EET - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a higher volatility of 37.01% compared to ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) at 25.42%. This indicates that EDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDZ | EET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.01% | 25.42% | +11.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.17% | 41.30% | +19.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.97% | 45.20% | +22.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.92% | 39.04% | +19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.50% | 40.96% | +20.54% |
EDZ vs. EET - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than EET's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDZ vs. EET - Dividend Comparison
EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than EET's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 7.60% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% |
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.34% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDZ and EET have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDZ has higher volatility (37.01%) compared to EET (25.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDZ dropped -99.99% vs EET's -71.66%.
On 10-year performance, EET leads with 10.67% vs -36.90% for EDZ. On fees, EET is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 25.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 10.67% return vs -36.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EET is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for EDZ.
EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 1.34% for EET.
EDZ tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%), while EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for EDZ and 0.95% for EET.
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDZ and EET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer