EDC vs. BNKU
EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EDC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%) while BNKU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EDC returned 137.10% vs 111.56% for BNKU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.
Performance
EDC vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 62.45% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's 14.86% return.
EDC
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 62.45%
- 6M
- 72.90%
- 1Y
- 137.10%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
BNKU
- 1D
- 5.30%
- 1M
- 29.28%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 111.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDC vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 62.45% | 64.89% |
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 14.86% | 34.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDC and BNKU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.38 |
EDC vs. BNKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDC
BNKU
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EDC
BNKU
-
Financial Services
EDC
BNKU
Consumer Cyclical
EDC
BNKU
-
Communication Services
EDC
BNKU
-
Industrials
EDC
BNKU
-
Basic Materials
EDC
BNKU
-
Energy
EDC
BNKU
-
Consumer Defensive
EDC
BNKU
-
Healthcare
EDC
BNKU
-
Utilities
EDC
BNKU
-
Real Estate
EDC
BNKU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDC vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank
EDC
BNKU
EDC vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDC | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.74 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 7.20 | +5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDC vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and BNKU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDC | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -61.21% | -31.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.98% | -40.97% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.52% | -2.63% | -62.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.35% | -18.05% | -47.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.25% | 15.55% | -4.30% |
Volatility
EDC vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 33.39% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) at 15.55%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDC | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.39% | 15.55% | +17.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.40% | 45.72% | +12.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.72% | 57.72% | +7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.74% | 73.10% | -15.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.12% | 73.10% | -11.98% |
EDC vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDC vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison
EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 1.05% | 1.79% | 3.94% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 0.97% | 0.78% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDC and BNKU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDC has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to BNKU (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs BNKU's -61.21%.
On 1-year performance, EDC leads with 137.10% vs 111.56% for BNKU. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EDC has performed better with a 137.10% return vs 111.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.
EDC has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.
EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.95% for BNKU.
EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDC and BNKU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer