PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 61.62% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 5.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EDC having a 9.00% annualized return and EDIV not far ahead at 9.37%.


EDC

1D
2.89%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
61.62%
6M
64.30%
1Y
129.65%
3Y*
46.97%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
9.00%

EDIV

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
5.85%
6M
5.50%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
61.62%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
5.85%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and EDIV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.88

The correlation between EDC and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDC vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
EDIV

Technology

32.7%
6.8%

Financial Services

20.8%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
7.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
5.2%

Industrials

7.3%
6.4%

Basic Materials

7.0%
0.9%

Energy

4.4%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

3.2%
0.6%

Utilities

2.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

EDC
32.7%
EDIV
6.8%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
EDIV
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
EDIV
7.6%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
EDIV
5.2%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
EDIV
6.4%

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
EDIV
0.9%

Energy

EDC
4.4%
EDIV
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
EDIV
9.3%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
EDIV
0.6%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
EDIV
1.6%

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
EDIV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDCEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.18

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.14

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

3.37

+8.03

EDC vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDC vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-53.36%

-39.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-10.36%

-27.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-13.84%

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.70%

-28.32%

-52.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

-40.76%

-46.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.70%

-4.58%

-61.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.34%

-19.30%

-46.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.41%

3.49%

+7.92%

Volatility

EDC vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 37.37% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.67%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.37%

4.67%

+32.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.68%

10.73%

+51.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.78%

12.56%

+55.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.59%

13.92%

+44.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.20%

17.38%

+43.82%

EDC vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than EDIV's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.23%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%0.00%0.00%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.29%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDC and EDIV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (37.37%) compared to EDIV (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 9.37% vs 9.00% for EDC. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.23% for EDC.

EDC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.49% for EDIV.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer