EDC vs. EDIV

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDC returned 3.69%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for EDIV. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.

Performance

EDC vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 42.09% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 3.69%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.09% annualized return.

EDC

• 1D: 7.65%
• 1M: -2.11%
• 6M: 12.03%
• YTD: 42.09%
• 1Y: 96.15%
• 3Y*: 37.61%
• 5Y*: -1.17%
• 10Y*: 3.69%
• ALL TIME*: 1.91%

EDIV

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 3.48%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 8.09%
• ALL TIME*: 3.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	$5.55M	$6.37M	$9.21M
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	$5.07M	$5.16M	$5.56M

EDC vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	42.09%	94.58%	-2.00%	7.48%	-60.25%	-20.81%	6.49%	43.92%	-49.87%	138.61%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	9.37%	16.45%	12.75%	41.91%	-15.31%	11.21%	-9.95%	11.80%	-6.16%	28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and EDIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011	0.87

The correlation between EDC and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDC vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDC	EDIV
Technology	32.7%	6.4%
Financial Services	20.8%	17.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	7.8%
Communication Services	7.8%	5.1%
Industrials	7.3%	6.2%
Basic Materials	7.0%	0.8%
Energy	4.4%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	9.3%
Healthcare	3.2%	0.6%
Utilities	2.2%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

EDC vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDC

EDC Risk / Return Rank: 51
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 38
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 40
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDC vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDC	EDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.13	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	1.64	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.21	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	1.41	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.72	4.12	+2.60

EDC vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDC vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and EDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDC	EDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.54%	-53.36%	-39.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.06%	-10.36%	-29.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.48%	-13.84%	-35.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.83%	-28.32%	-49.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.01%	-40.76%	-46.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.84%	-1.40%	-68.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.37%	-19.18%	-46.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.35%	3.54%	+10.81%

Volatility

EDC vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 26.60% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 3.74%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDC	EDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.60%	3.74%	+22.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.61%	11.10%	+56.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.40%	12.94%	+60.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.52%	13.96%	+45.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.65%	17.31%	+44.34%

EDC vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDC vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than EDIV's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	1.40%	1.79%	3.94%	3.54%	0.00%	0.18%	0.44%	0.97%	0.78%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.15%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDC and EDIV in my portfolio?

EDC and EDIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDC or EDIV?

EDC has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to EDIV (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

Which ETF is better, EDC or EDIV?

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 8.09% vs 3.69% for EDC. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDC or EDIV?

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDC or EDIV?

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDC or EDIV?

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.40% for EDC.

What is the main difference between EDC and EDIV?

EDC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.49% for EDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.