PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. EET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. EET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 41.26% return, which is significantly higher than EET's 30.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has underperformed EET with an annualized return of 5.33%, while EET has yielded a comparatively higher 8.77% annualized return.


EDC

1D
-19.64%
1M
-16.09%
YTD
41.26%
6M
46.07%
1Y
121.30%
3Y*
39.05%
5Y*
-5.24%
10Y*
5.33%

EET

1D
-13.21%
1M
-10.23%
YTD
30.70%
6M
33.88%
1Y
79.47%
3Y*
30.47%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. EET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
41.26%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
30.70%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and EET is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009

0.98

The correlation between EDC and EET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDC vs. EET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
EET

Technology

32.7%

-

Financial Services

20.8%
51.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%

-

Communication Services

7.8%

-

Industrials

7.3%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Energy

4.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

EDC
32.7%
EET

-

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
EET
51.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
EET

-

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
EET

-

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
EET

-

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
EET

-

Energy

EDC
4.4%
EET

-

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
EET

-

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
EET

-

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
EET

-

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
EET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. EET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. EET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDCEETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.03

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

10.98

+0.20

EDC vs. EET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the EET Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and EET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDCEETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.91

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.02

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.22

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.10

-0.07

Drawdowns

EDC vs. EET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than EET's maximum drawdown of -71.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and EET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCEETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-71.66%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-26.38%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-34.89%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.70%

-64.51%

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

-69.07%

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.02%

-17.35%

-52.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-37.25%

-28.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.90%

7.26%

+3.64%

Volatility

EDC vs. EET - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 32.64% compared to ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) at 21.71%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCEETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.64%

21.71%

+10.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.70%

37.55%

+19.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.00%

41.92%

+21.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.35%

38.24%

+19.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.01%

40.81%

+20.20%

EDC vs. EET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EET's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. EET - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than EET's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.21%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.45%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EDC and EET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EDC has higher volatility (32.64%) compared to EET (21.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs EET's -71.66%.

On 10-year performance, EET leads with 8.77% vs 5.33% for EDC. On fees, EET is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 21.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EET is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.21% for EDC.

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.95% for EET.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and EET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer