EDC vs. TMF
EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDC returned 4.52%/yr vs -17.84%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
EDC vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 42.81% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of 4.52%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -17.84% annualized return.
EDC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -20.11%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- YTD
- 42.81%
- 1Y
- 95.76%
- 3Y*
- 35.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.51%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
TMF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -13.00%
- YTD
- -9.97%
- 1Y
- -2.56%
- 3Y*
- -21.07%
- 5Y*
- -33.43%
- 10Y*
- -17.84%
EDC vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 42.81% | 94.58% | -2.00% | 7.48% | -60.25% | -20.81% | 6.49% | 43.92% | -49.87% | 138.61% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -9.97% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDC and TMF is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.20 |
The correlation between EDC and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDC vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
EDC
TMF
EDC vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDC | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.01 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.10 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | -0.20 | +7.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDC vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDC | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -92.89% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.98% | -26.51% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.48% | -55.14% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.33% | -88.81% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.01% | -92.89% | +5.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.69% | -92.55% | +22.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.35% | -43.93% | -21.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.37% | 12.98% | -0.61% |
Volatility
EDC vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 31.93% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.49%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDC | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.93% | 7.49% | +24.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.24% | 19.83% | +45.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.51% | 27.57% | +42.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.10% | 46.49% | +12.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.31% | 43.71% | +17.60% |
EDC vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDC vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than TMF's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 1.39% | 1.79% | 3.94% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 0.97% | 0.78% | 0.25% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDC and TMF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDC has higher volatility (31.93%) compared to TMF (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 4.52% vs -17.84% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 4.52% return vs -17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 1.39% for EDC.
EDC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 1.01% for TMF.
EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDC and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer