EDC vs. YINN

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - EDC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%) while YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDC returned 5.33%/yr vs -19.92%/yr for YINN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.

Performance

EDC vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 41.26% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -32.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of 5.33%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -19.92% annualized return.

EDC

• 1D: -19.64%
• 1M: -16.09%
• YTD: 41.26%
• 6M: 46.07%
• 1Y: 121.30%
• 3Y*: 39.05%
• 5Y*: -5.24%
• 10Y*: 5.33%

YINN

• 1D: -6.36%
• 1M: -22.22%
• YTD: -32.82%
• 6M: -39.26%
• 1Y: -27.25%
• 3Y*: -6.94%
• 5Y*: -39.49%
• 10Y*: -19.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	41.26%	94.58%	-2.00%	7.48%	-60.25%	-20.81%	6.49%	43.92%	-49.87%	138.61%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-32.82%	54.21%	36.06%	-53.08%	-71.97%	-58.56%	-7.75%	28.92%	-48.47%	129.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and YINN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2009	0.84

The correlation between EDC and YINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDC vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDC	YINN
Technology	32.7%	5.5%
Financial Services	20.8%	34.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	27.4%
Communication Services	7.8%	15.7%
Industrials	7.3%	2.4%
Basic Materials	7.0%	4.2%
Energy	4.4%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	0.9%
Healthcare	3.2%	2.3%
Utilities	2.2%	0.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.0%

Return for Risk

EDC vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC

EDC Risk / Return Rank: 59
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 64

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 5
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDC	YINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	-0.47	+2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	-0.35	+2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.96	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	-0.55	+3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.18	-1.11	+12.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDC vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the YINN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and YINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDC	YINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	-0.47	+2.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	-0.42	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	-0.24	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	-0.22	+0.25

Drawdowns

EDC vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and YINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDC	YINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.54%	-98.87%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.98%	-49.34%	+11.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.48%	-69.08%	+19.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.70%	-96.28%	+15.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.01%	-98.59%	+11.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.02%	-97.62%	+27.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.36%	-68.49%	+3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.90%	24.59%	-13.69%

Volatility

EDC vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 32.64% compared to Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) at 20.04%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDC	YINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.64%	20.04%	+12.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.70%	43.02%	+13.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.00%	58.84%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.35%	94.19%	-36.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.01%	81.79%	-20.78%

EDC vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDC vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than YINN's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	1.21%	1.79%	3.94%	3.54%	0.00%	0.18%	0.44%	0.97%	0.78%	0.25%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.48%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDC and YINN in my portfolio?

EDC and YINN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDC or YINN?

EDC has higher volatility (32.64%) compared to YINN (20.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs YINN's -98.87%.

Which ETF is better, EDC or YINN?

On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 5.33% vs -19.92% for YINN. On fees, EDC is cheaper at 1.33% per year. On volatility, YINN has been the lower-risk option at 20.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDC or YINN?

Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 5.33% return vs -19.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDC or YINN?

EDC is cheaper with a 1.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDC or YINN?

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.21% for EDC.

What is the main difference between EDC and YINN?

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 1.52% for YINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.