ECNS vs. CN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds - ECNS tracks the MSCI China Small Cap Index while CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ECNS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

ECNS vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ECNS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: -15.13%
• YTD: -10.84%
• 1Y: -10.63%
• 3Y*: 3.54%
• 5Y*: -7.01%
• 10Y*: 0.89%
• ALL TIME*: 0.21%

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	$217.02K	$210.44K	$354.53K

ECNS vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	-10.84%	36.49%	5.64%	-23.05%	-24.58%	2.11%	25.42%	7.84%	-18.27%	27.55%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ECNS and CN is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014	0.66

The correlation between ECNS and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECNS vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECNS	CN
Healthcare	21.2%	0.8%
Industrials	20.1%	1.0%
Technology	10.7%	0.3%
Basic Materials	9.2%	0.6%
Communication Services	8.7%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	5.4%
Real Estate	8.0%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	0.3%
Financial Services	4.4%	55.1%
Utilities	2.3%	0.2%
Energy	1.8%	0.9%

Return for Risk

ECNS vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECNS

ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 5
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECNS vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECNS	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ECNS	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.60%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.51%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ECNS	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.09%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.82%	—	—

ECNS vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECNS vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	6.60%	6.20%	5.98%	4.89%	3.54%	4.87%	3.59%	3.23%	6.16%	3.18%	4.29%	3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECNS and CN in my portfolio?

ECNS and CN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ECNS or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECNS or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECNS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECNS or CN?

ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between ECNS and CN?

ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECNS and 0.50% for CN.