PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECHO vs. BAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECHO vs. BAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EchoStar Corporation (ECHO) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ECHO

1D
0.65%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAP

1D
1.26%
1M
13.70%
YTD
42.16%
6M
40.69%
1Y
82.53%
3Y*
46.33%
5Y*
33.19%
10Y*
14.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECHO vs. BAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
-1.85%
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ECHO and BAP is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2026

-0.54

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECHO vs. BAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BAP
BAP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECHO vs. BAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EchoStar Corporation (ECHO) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECHOBAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

ECHO vs. BAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECHO vs. BAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECHO drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum BAP drawdown of -75.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHO and BAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHOBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-75.92%

+69.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

0.00%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-23.90%

+20.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

Volatility

ECHO vs. BAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHOBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.51%

33.37%

+9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.51%

31.71%

+10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.51%

31.24%

+11.27%

Dividends

ECHO vs. BAP - Dividend Comparison

ECHO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
3.66%3.78%6.65%4.52%2.84%0.99%5.37%3.95%1.94%4.16%1.47%2.25%
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ECHO vs. BAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EchoStar Corporation and Credicorp Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.74B
(ECHO) Total Revenue
(BAP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ECHO values in USD, BAP values in PEN

Frequently Asked Questions


ECHO and BAP have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECHO and BAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer