PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECG vs. FET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECG vs. FET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECG achieves a 46.60% return, which is significantly lower than FET's 69.61% return.


ECG

1D
2.03%
1M
-9.28%
6M
41.74%
YTD
46.60%
1Y
78.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
91.65%

FET

1D
21.85%
1M
33.40%
6M
38.53%
YTD
69.61%
1Y
240.97%
3Y*
31.63%
5Y*
23.61%
10Y*
-14.87%
ALL TIME*
-12.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$60.82M$76.45M$96.15M
$10.09M$8.40M$8.95M

ECG vs. FET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ECG
Everus Construction Group Inc
46.60%30.13%64.17%
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
69.61%138.54%7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ECG and FET is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2024

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECG:

$6.40B

FET:

$708.44M

EPS

ECG:

$4.37

FET:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

ECG:

1.62

FET:

0.89

PB Ratio

ECG:

9.35

FET:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECG:

$3.96B

FET:

$833.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECG:

$492.32M

FET:

$233.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

ECG:

$334.68M

FET:

$63.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECG vs. FET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECG
ECG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ECG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ECG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FET
FET Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FET Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECG vs. FET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECGFETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.54

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

7.87

-5.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

21.61

-14.84

ECG vs. FET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the FET Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECG and FET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECG vs. FET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECG drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum FET drawdown of -99.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECG and FET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECGFETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-99.56%

+43.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.46%

-27.87%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-91.47%

+65.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.14%

-69.05%

+54.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.23%

10.16%

+0.07%

Volatility

ECG vs. FET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) is 22.82%, while Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) has a volatility of 24.12%. This indicates that ECG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECGFETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.82%

24.12%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.17%

38.78%

+11.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.55%

57.86%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.03%

50.64%

+15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.03%

82.60%

-16.57%

Dividends

ECG vs. FET - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECG nor FET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ECG vs. FET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everus Construction Group Inc and Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ECG vs. FET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Everus Construction Group Inc and Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ECG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a gross profit of 130.73M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

FET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.35M and revenue of 226.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.

ECG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported an operating income of 77.68M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

FET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.53M and revenue of 226.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

ECG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a net income of 58.32M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

FET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 12.41M and revenue of 226.22M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECG and FET have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FET has higher volatility (24.12%) compared to ECG (22.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECG dropped -56.23% vs FET's -99.56%.

FET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECG and FET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer