FET vs. MTZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ).

Performance

FET vs. MTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FET vs. MTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FET Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.	58.76%	138.54%	-30.13%	-24.85%	83.80%	34.87%	-64.58%	-59.32%	-73.44%	-29.32%
MTZ MasTec, Inc.	48.01%	59.67%	79.79%	-11.26%	-7.53%	35.35%	6.27%	58.19%	-17.14%	27.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FET : $708.91M MTZ : $25.33B
EPS FET : -$0.79 MTZ : $5.06
PS Ratio FET : 0.91 MTZ : 1.77
PB Ratio FET : 2.43 MTZ : 7.60
Total Revenue (TTM) FET : $791.47M MTZ : $14.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) FET : $219.04M MTZ : $1.79B
EBITDA (TTM) FET : $51.01M MTZ : $1.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FET achieves a 58.76% return, which is significantly higher than MTZ's 48.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FET has underperformed MTZ with an annualized return of -13.76%, while MTZ has yielded a comparatively higher 31.86% annualized return.

FET

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 58.76%
• 6M: 119.62%
• 1Y: 191.70%
• 3Y*: 32.13%
• 5Y*: 24.51%
• 10Y*: -13.76%

MTZ

• 1D: 5.21%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 48.01%
• 6M: 51.19%
• 1Y: 175.67%
• 3Y*: 50.47%
• 5Y*: 27.69%
• 10Y*: 31.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FET vs. MTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FET

FET Risk / Return Rank: 94
FET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FET Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FET Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FET Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FET Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MTZ

MTZ Risk / Return Rank: 98
MTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FET vs. MTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FET	MTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.21	4.32	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	4.22	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.61	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.47	12.68	-7.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.66	37.92	-23.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FET vs. MTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FET Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the MTZ Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FET and MTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FET	MTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21	4.32	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.66	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17	0.73	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.19	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between FET and MTZ is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FET vs. MTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FET nor MTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FET vs. MTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FET drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MTZ drawdown of -97.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FET and MTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FET	MTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.56%	-97.72%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.54%	-14.13%	-20.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.14%	-61.01%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.34%	-67.92%	-31.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.01%	-0.56%	-91.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.50%	-52.14%	-16.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.89%	4.72%	+8.17%

Volatility

FET vs. MTZ - Volatility Comparison

Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) have volatilities of 14.57% and 14.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FET	MTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.57%	14.12%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.96%	29.41%	+9.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.16%	40.95%	+19.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.33%	42.17%	+8.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.52%	43.63%	+38.89%

Financials

FET vs. MTZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and MasTec, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.08M and revenue of 202.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

MTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 508.34M and revenue of 3.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

FET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.76M and revenue of 202.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 319.21M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

FET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 2.07M and revenue of 202.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

MTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 142.71M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.