PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECG vs. GSAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECG vs. GSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECG achieves a 92.51% return, which is significantly higher than GSAT's 30.75% return.


ECG

1D
4.44%
1M
10.80%
YTD
92.51%
6M
82.99%
1Y
178.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSAT

1D
-0.75%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
30.75%
6M
19.78%
1Y
239.91%
3Y*
76.29%
5Y*
24.62%
10Y*
16.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECG vs. GSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ECG
Everus Construction Group Inc
92.51%30.13%64.17%
GSAT
Globalstar, Inc.
30.75%96.59%100.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ECG and GSAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2024

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECG:

$8.43B

GSAT:

$10.25B

EPS

ECG:

$4.37

GSAT:

-$0.11

PS Ratio

ECG:

2.13

GSAT:

35.97

PB Ratio

ECG:

12.27

GSAT:

29.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECG:

$3.96B

GSAT:

$283.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECG:

$492.32M

GSAT:

$95.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

ECG:

$334.68M

GSAT:

$69.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECG vs. GSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECG
ECG Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ECG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ECG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GSAT
GSAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECG vs. GSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECGGSATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.86

9.10

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.70

22.24

+0.46

ECG vs. GSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECG Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the GSAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECG and GSAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECG vs. GSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECG drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum GSAT drawdown of -99.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECG and GSAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECGGSATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-99.14%

+42.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.26%

-26.53%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-69.63%

+67.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-88.36%

+74.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

10.84%

-2.95%

Volatility

ECG vs. GSAT - Volatility Comparison

Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) at 4.61%. This indicates that ECG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECGGSATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.35%

4.61%

+9.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.86%

41.16%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.73%

69.78%

-12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.03%

77.67%

-12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.03%

89.82%

-24.79%

Dividends

ECG vs. GSAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECG nor GSAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ECG vs. GSAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everus Construction Group Inc and Globalstar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.04B
70.06M
(ECG) Total Revenue
(GSAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ECG vs. GSAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Everus Construction Group Inc and Globalstar, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
12.6%
0
Portfolio components
ECG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a gross profit of 130.73M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

GSAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Globalstar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 70.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ECG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported an operating income of 77.68M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

GSAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Globalstar, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.17M and revenue of 70.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

ECG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a net income of 58.32M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

GSAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Globalstar, Inc. reported a net income of -20.04M and revenue of 70.06M, resulting in a net margin of -28.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECG and GSAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECG has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to GSAT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECG dropped -56.23% vs GSAT's -99.14%.

GSAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECG and GSAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer