PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FET vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FET vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FET achieves a 42.68% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FET has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -16.74%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.46% annualized return.


FET

1D
4.03%
1M
-10.25%
YTD
42.68%
6M
65.37%
1Y
255.02%
3Y*
30.01%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
-16.74%

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FET vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
42.68%138.54%-30.13%-24.85%83.80%34.87%-64.58%-59.32%-73.44%-29.32%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FET and NVDA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2012

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FET:

$613.71M

NVDA:

$5.43T

EPS

FET:

-$0.52

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

FET:

0.79

NVDA:

21.50

PB Ratio

FET:

2.19

NVDA:

27.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

FET:

$806.90M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FET:

$221.67M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

FET:

$70.89M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FET vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FET
FET Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FET Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FET vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FETNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.82

1.84

+2.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.36

2.47

+1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.30

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.61

3.21

+8.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

40.28

7.92

+32.36

FET vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FET Sharpe Ratio is 4.82, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FET and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FETNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82

1.84

+2.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.31

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

1.40

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.63

-0.82

Drawdowns

FET vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FET drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FET and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.56%

-89.72%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.19%

-20.21%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.62%

-36.88%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.14%

-66.34%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.34%

-66.34%

-33.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.82%

-5.48%

-87.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.79%

-36.21%

-32.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.40%

8.20%

-1.80%

Volatility

FET vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) has a higher volatility of 12.82% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that FET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.82%

11.79%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.66%

25.29%

+8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.28%

34.03%

+19.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.75%

51.66%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.51%

49.80%

+32.71%

Dividends

FET vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

FET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

FET vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
208.70M
81.62B
(FET) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FET vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
29.2%
74.9%
Portfolio components
FET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.99M and revenue of 208.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

FET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.01M and revenue of 208.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

FET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 4.49M and revenue of 208.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FET and NVDA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FET has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FET dropped -99.56% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

FET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.82 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FET and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer