PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FET vs. TCOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FET vs. TCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FET achieves a 69.61% return, which is significantly higher than TCOM's -34.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FET has underperformed TCOM with an annualized return of -14.87%, while TCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 1.05% annualized return.


FET

1D
21.85%
1M
33.40%
6M
38.53%
YTD
69.61%
1Y
240.97%
3Y*
31.63%
5Y*
23.61%
10Y*
-14.87%
ALL TIME*
-12.88%

TCOM

1D
1.14%
1M
14.66%
6M
-23.40%
YTD
-34.63%
1Y
-22.46%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
1.05%
ALL TIME*
16.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.09M$8.40M$8.95M
$161.73M$136.85M$152.49M

FET vs. TCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
69.61%138.54%-30.13%-24.85%83.80%34.87%-64.58%-59.32%-73.44%-29.32%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
-34.63%5.24%90.67%4.68%39.72%-27.01%0.57%23.95%-38.64%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FET and TCOM is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012

0.20

The correlation between FET and TCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FET:

$708.44M

TCOM:

$29.60B

EPS

FET:

-$0.13

TCOM:

CN¥45.41

PS Ratio

FET:

0.89

TCOM:

3.41

PB Ratio

FET:

2.53

TCOM:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

FET:

$833.35M

TCOM:

CN¥64.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FET:

$233.66M

TCOM:

CN¥51.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

FET:

$63.99M

TCOM:

CN¥39.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FET vs. TCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FET
FET Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FET Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TCOM
TCOM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FET vs. TCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FETTCOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

0.90

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.87

-0.49

+8.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.61

-0.89

+22.49

FET vs. TCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FET Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the TCOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FET and TCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FET vs. TCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FET drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, which is greater than TCOM's maximum drawdown of -76.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FET and TCOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETTCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.56%

-76.34%

-23.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.87%

-49.54%

+21.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.07%

-49.54%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.14%

-49.54%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.34%

-71.96%

-27.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.47%

-40.46%

-51.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.05%

-27.93%

-41.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.16%

27.19%

-17.03%

Volatility

FET vs. TCOM - Volatility Comparison

Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) has a higher volatility of 24.12% compared to Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) at 7.88%. This indicates that FET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETTCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.12%

7.88%

+16.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.78%

24.85%

+13.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.86%

38.45%

+19.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.64%

49.11%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.60%

44.47%

+38.13%

Dividends

FET vs. TCOM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FET nor TCOM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
0.00%0.42%

Financials

FET vs. TCOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and Trip.com Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FET vs. TCOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and Trip.com Group Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.35M and revenue of 226.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.

TCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 16.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.

FET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.53M and revenue of 226.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

TCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.92B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.

FET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 12.41M and revenue of 226.22M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

TCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FET and TCOM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FET has higher volatility (24.12%) compared to TCOM (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FET dropped -99.56% vs TCOM's -76.34%.

FET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FET and TCOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer