ECG vs. POWL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL).

Performance

ECG vs. POWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ECG vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ECG Everus Construction Group Inc	37.99%	30.13%	34.18%
POWL Powell Industries, Inc.	69.82%	44.49%	-14.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ECG : $6.04B POWL : $6.58B
EPS ECG : $3.95 POWL : $15.39
PE Ratio ECG : 29.92 POWL : 35.15
PEG Ratio ECG : 1.75 POWL : 0.06
PS Ratio ECG : 1.61 POWL : 5.91
PB Ratio ECG : 9.59 POWL : 9.84
Total Revenue (TTM) ECG : $3.75B POWL : $1.11B
Gross Profit (TTM) ECG : $454.09M POWL : $336.28M
EBITDA (TTM) ECG : $297.82M POWL : $236.98M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECG achieves a 37.99% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 69.82% return.

ECG

• 1D: 6.05%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: 37.99%
• 6M: 37.68%
• 1Y: 218.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POWL

• 1D: 7.66%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 69.82%
• 6M: 77.75%
• 1Y: 218.89%
• 3Y*: 135.06%
• 5Y*: 77.57%
• 10Y*: 36.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ECG vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECG

ECG Risk / Return Rank: 97
ECG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ECG Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ECG Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ECG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ECG Martin Ratio Rank: 99

POWL

POWL Risk / Return Rank: 96
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECG vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECG	POWL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.69	3.77	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	3.74	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.45	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.17	6.72	+4.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	31.56	21.57	+9.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECG vs. POWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECG Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is comparable to the POWL Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECG and POWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECG	POWL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69	3.77	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.26	+1.10

Correlation

The correlation between ECG and POWL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ECG vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison

ECG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECG Everus Construction Group Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWL Powell Industries, Inc.	0.20%	0.34%	0.48%	1.19%	2.96%	3.53%	3.53%	2.12%	4.16%	3.63%	2.67%	4.00%

Drawdowns

ECG vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECG drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum POWL drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECG and POWL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECG	POWL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.23%	-73.10%	+16.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.26%	-30.88%	+10.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.25%	-8.70%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.09%	-36.27%	+21.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	9.61%	-2.44%

Volatility

ECG vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) is 17.47%, while Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a volatility of 21.23%. This indicates that ECG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECG	POWL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.47%	21.23%	-3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.39%	43.63%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.54%	58.53%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.76%	63.13%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.76%	54.21%	+9.55%

Financials

ECG vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Everus Construction Group Inc and Powell Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ECG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a gross profit of 117.50M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.6%.

POWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.42M and revenue of 251.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.4%.

ECG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported an operating income of 68.88M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

POWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.99M and revenue of 251.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

ECG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a net income of 55.28M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

POWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 41.39M and revenue of 251.18M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.